D3D Risk Assessment

From Open Source Ecology
Revision as of 18:09, 8 February 2016 by Marcin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The main sources of risk experienced in OSE's workshop model indlclude I order of I.pittance and sequencing:

  • Design completion - without design co.position, an XM event is impossible to execute
  • Instructionals completion - without instructionals completion, from full detail, to cheat sheet, to video detail - XM results are significantly degraded in terms of completion status and crowd enjoyment level
  • Supply chain management - issues related to persistent supply chain variability, stock, shipping time, u proven sourcing, etc.
  • Marketing - proper video and timely announcement, as well as campaign, are critical. A publicity strategy is the indispensable for success.
  • Software (in projects requiring software jnstallation or use)

Supply Chain

High risk, needs resolution urgently.

For the Prusa i3 kit from Folgertech, assuming this will be a continuing workshop, backups are needed for the comllete Folgertech kit. This includes laser cut parts, special motor mounts made of metal, off-shelf bolts etc, 3D printed parts, electronics, print surface (not included) and add-on.

Our evolution strategy is to minimize parts count in D3D, and to produce alternative sourcing, with multiple (5 good sources).

Design Completion

Low risk. 10 years of development are already embodied in the current design, and it is a mature technology ready for market.