Logical Fallacies

From Open Source Ecology
Revision as of 14:19, 13 April 2018 by Marcin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Faulty logic can take many forms. Here are some:

  • Mislaced concreteness an James's vicious abstractionism seems to undermine many philosophies - [1]
  • Generalization - formulation of general concepts from specific instances, often making inaccurate assessment
  • Omission - omitting relevant details and therefore making for inaccuracy/confusion
  • Mind-reading- assuming that we know what others are thinking. We cannot really know what others are thinking because situations are complex. To think otherwise is dangerous. See [2]
  • Confirmation bias - is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses
  • Overconfidence in evaluating ourselves
  • Blind spots - things we don't know that we don't know
  • Apophenia - tendency to perceive connections and meaning between unrelated things
  • Hegemony - assuming 'that's just how things are' and nothing else can work or be changed
  • Non-sequitur - something that does not follow. Assuming some result when that conclusion cannot be drawn without further knowledge.