Fairphone

From Open Source Ecology
Revision as of 14:13, 17 April 2019 by Marcin (talk | contribs) (→‎OSE Assessment)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<html><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/96XfmrJMlNU" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></html>

Highlights:

  • Fair trade tantalum, tin, gold working directly with certified mines in the Congo, Zaire, and Peru.
  • Replaceable parts
  • High cost
  • Closed hardware
  • Open software

Links

OSE Assessment

  • Fairphone scores approximately 50% - a middle score on the OSE Specifications Metric.
  • Main pros: open source software (not completely), fair trade components, longer lifetime, replaceable components.
  • Main cons: closed hardware design, not distributive enterprise, high cost. Low recursion level, such as not using MLCC [2] instead of tantalum to avoid Congo all together.