Live Swivels
Live swiwels are not adequate for 360 degree Backhoes
See [1]
Rotary Unions in 360 Excavator
- A specialized rotary union is used, not just a simple live swivel - [2]
- Explanation from hydraulics and pneumatics - [3]
- In real life: Infinite spin is attained. From Reddit thread - [4] -
<html><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/oUVE2PIV5_k" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe> </html>
Rotating 360 Without 360 Rotary Union?
<html><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ha2otJnU4pQ" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></html>
Backhoe vs Excavator
- Backhoe spins 200 degrees, excavator a full 360 degrees. [5]
Shopping
- $1500 for 1/2: rotary union [6]. But what about the female socket part?
OSE Solution Patent Unpending
Here is a simple open source solution - use radio frequency control or Ardupilot to provide remote control to a track unit, which has its own drive system - controlled remotely from the operator cab. This is a $100 solution (cost of Arduino-based RF control system), or about 15x lower cost than industry standards.
Concept:
- Operator sits in the cab, or drives the 360 excavator remotely all together.
- Cab has its own hydraulic power unit for excavator boom, stick, and bucket.
- Second hydraulic power unit on the track system runs track drive (minimum of 2 hudraulic motors or 4 hoses).
- Second hydraulic power unit - either electric or fuel-based - is run via remote control - avoiding necessity of hoses running through a 360 degree, infinitely rotating joing.
- This eliminates the need of an industry standard rotary union, at $1500 [7] and up [8] for 4 hoses, and provides a solution at about 15x-50x lower cost.
- Disadvantage is the requirement of a separate power unit, but this could be turned into an advantage when using smart controls which allow the separate power unit to be turned off. Since OSE uses multiple engine modules, this is not a disadvantage in the OSE case.
This concept is published in the public domain for the benefit of all, and to provide patent prior art to prevent patent trolls from privatizing this obvious concept. If you run into anyone trying to petent this idea, please let us know or inform the patent office of this prior art.