Russian Invastion of Ukraine

From Open Source Ecology
Revision as of 22:11, 17 March 2022 by Marcin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Mar 17, 2022

Interesting News Sources

Mar 14, 2022

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/03/ukraine-united-states-nato/627052/ suggests a proper response - treating Russia like the gangsta it is

Mar 11, 2022

  • Analysts appear to state that escalation is likely to lead to a nuclear weapon being used, based on war game scenarios back from 2014. No visible offramp exists for Putin, as he controls Russia's information flows. [1]

Analysis Mar 8, 2022

  • First, understand nuclear strategy - [2]
  • One possibility is that the Rubicon has been crossed - [3]
  • Then, read about an analysis interpreted on Mar 5, 2022 regarding a possible fall of Russia according to a leaked document from Russian intelligence known as FSB - - is this document verified or fake? - [4]. Case made is not impossible. It may be likely - logic there appears to be sound. Unless this is pure psyops.

Communications

Mar 8, 2022

To Catarina -

Read my retweet from Igor Sushko based on a leaked report, translated, mentioned in The Times (UK) article recently

https://twitter.com/marcin_ose

A 2000 word doc from FSB that discusses that Russia is in deep shit and that the west should enter the war before too many more innocent lives are lost.

I also posted this on the wiki with some more supporting info on nuclear strategy at

https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/wiki/Ukraine_War#Analysis_Mar_8.2C_2022

Truth Wins

  • Here's a possitive outlook - [5]

Military Analysis

  • Air Force Magazine - [6]

Losses

  • Russia - [7]. By Interfax Ukraine - [8]
  • Ukraine - why is this not visible?

Military Aid Needs

  • Mar 1 - in Defense News - [9]

Intro

Recents on Twitter - https://twitter.com/search?q=ukraine%20news&src=typed_query&f=live

Check out this contrarian viewpoint - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vdiEABLFoo from the feed. at about 4 AM Sunday CST USA. From Coach Red Pill on Telegram. How fascinating.

It is interesting to see the arguments promoted by each side. From the assumptions that the good or evil side takes, their respective conclusions appear sound. Their conclusions depend on the assumptions that they are making. And assumptions depend on admissible information - which information the viewpoint includes and which it omits in its considerations. And what values it holds. Thus, one could gain reconciliation or admit to differences based on admissible information and therefore the assumptions made.