From Fascism to Inclusion, From Me to We

Fascism literally refers to a bundle - of 'just us.' It is not inclusive - one of the central themes of OSE.

We are interested in 'we', not 'me me me'.

Fascism is really a 'collective me' - not a collective 'we'.

OSE's approach is inclusive. Practically, this means that we can objectively talk about things in inclusive language. The opposite is exclusive, polarizing language. @ZeroHedge (according to Christo Grozev is a polarizing example. Conspiracy theories are polarizing language - frames in the 'us vs them' language.

In OSE's world, there is no us vs them. We are all in it together. It is not the evil corporation. It is the complex web of interaction where we buy the evil corporation's products. True, we may be ignorant, or preoccupied with life - when we do that.

For example, the horseshoe of radical leftists and rightist is an interesting case. Quoting Grozev, the radical leftists are known as 'useful idiots' who work for free, while the radical rightist have to be paid to spread propaganda.

Propaganda is a highly fascist thing, where we promote one side.

Is it said that we promote 'one side' when we promote inclusion? Doesn't appear to be.

If we promote inclusion- of we are all in it together - then we recognize that we are all useful idiots to some extent - unless our Mental Models are highly refined. So we can include ourselves in the useful idiots category without polarization.

The opposite of inclusion is not exclusion - it's fascism. To bring up fascism appears useful because it shocks us to clarity - whereas 'exclusion' is a nebulous term.

A Black Man Attending KKK Rallies is a great example of inclusion.

These thoughts here are core OSE Culture of exclusion.

By inclusive communication, which certainly reptarts and libtarts are guilty of - we can start bridging gaps. At the same time, this does not mean that we don't use violence to fight violence, like in the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Inclusion is not inconsistent with the fact that the guilty must be punished. The Punisher is a superhero, after all. An approach seeking nonviolence can be very violent. We must resolve all these seeming contradictions as we learn to be Integrated Humans.

Practical Solution

To solve for 'we' - a collaborative mindset - the best solution appears to be banishment. For example, we banish Russia by not buying its oil. Is it as simple as that? Or, stop North Korea by China ending trade with it? Thus, stop trade with China if China doesn't want to banish North Korea? It seems that simple banishment (ie, exclusion from interstate commerce) could be one solution. Or setting up exchange programs for young N. Koreans. How naive is that? Say we have $100B, or one corporation's worth - can we buy North Korea? Is Korea for sale? Sure, we can buy their dictator.