same star rating as for FIT XM Evaluation

Specifics of Content

Did the Fellow present the overarching OSE narrative and mission successfully?
Were the 6 tools mentioned, and the function of each?
Did it become clear what each machine is capable of and what are its limits?
Were the 3 main activities of Fellows clear?
Was the XM workshop model exlained, with 3 clear examples?
Was the environmental aspects emphasized: for plastic recycling, energy efficiency (fast print), and materials efficiency (way to make a frame with 0 metal waste)?
Were Design Jams explained?
Was the crowdfunded, crowd-design aspect clear - in terms of how public product development can occur starting with schools and libraries?
Was the Open Source Earth Catalog / Open Source Everything Store concept clear?
Was the history of open source clear, and why it doesn't exist today?

General

Was the Fellow confident?
Was the Fellow Energetic?
Was the presentation Clear?
Was the Fellow Entertaining?
Was the Fellow clear, organized, and well-prepared? Ie, did the slides lead the presenter - or did the presenter just use the slides as ancillary?
How did the Fellow appear? Did they smell? Did they have clean clothes
Was the cadence and pace adequate?
Was the presentation coherent?
Did the presentation inspire the audience?
Did the Fellow have good eye contact?
No ahs and ums?
How did the Fellow handle questions?
How did the Fellow handle questions that they did not know an answer to?