Tiers of Enterprise: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
:*Aims for zero waste within processes by continuous quality improvement | :*Aims for zero waste within processes by continuous quality improvement | ||
:*Is founded on drive for [[Regenerative Development]] of ecosystems and humans | :*Is founded on drive for [[Regenerative Development]] of ecosystems and humans | ||
[[Category:Distributive Enterprise]] |
Revision as of 06:14, 28 February 2016
Tiers of Enterprise is an internal OSE classification for enterprises. This assessment of Enterprise Tiers is based on the tendency of the enterprise to distribute vs. concentrate wealth.
- Tier A: The Big Enterprise. The super-concentrator business-as-usual enterprise. Refers to extreme-performing generators and concentrators of wealth, such as typical outcomes of leading accelerators like Y Combinator. A good example of a Tier A enterprise is Apple or Google. Such enterprises are:
- Closed source at most or all levels, as far as Open Design of their products is concerned in the broad sense
- Focus on market monopolization as one of their key competitiveness strategies
- Lead to extreme concentration of wealth, and as a result tend to buy innovation more than to develop innovation
- Tend to violate human rights of factory workers, and of privacy and choice through the use of their products
- IP protection is critical to their success. Favor patent protectionism, trade secrets, secrecy, etc in their culture and operations
- Profit motive drives decision-making
- Little regard for natural capital
- 50% waste within processes can be achieved by continuous quality improvement
- Does not contribute fundamentally to Regenerative Development
- Tier B: The Medium Enterprise. The non-distributors. Business-as-usual enterprise with capital-concentrative tendencies, similar to Tier A but at the million-dollar rather than billion dollar scale budgets.
- Tier C: The social enterprise. Typically formed to serve humanity.
- May or may not be open source (see Open Design)
- Focus on serving people as one of their key competitiveness strategies
- Do not tend to extreme concentration of wealth, as social benefit pre-empts such drive
- Tend to protect human rights
- IP protection is not critical to success
- Social benefit drives decision-making
- Natural capital is considered
- 50% waste within processes can be achieved by continuous quality improvement
- May contribute to Regenerative Development
- Tier D: The Distributive Enterprise. A social enterprise with an explicit focus of distributing power via Open Design up to the enterprise design.
- Is open source, OSHWA and FSF/OSI compliant
- Focuses competitiveness strategy on open, collaborative development
- Tends towards absolute distribution of wealth
- Tends to improve human rights of self-determination
- IP protection is antithetical to its operations and goals
- Skill building and distribution of economic power drives decision-making
- Natural capital is fundamentally regenerated
- Aims for zero waste within processes by continuous quality improvement
- Is founded on drive for Regenerative Development of ecosystems and humans