Tiers of Enterprise: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Tiers of Enterprise is an internal OSE classification for enterprises. This assessment of Enterprise Tiers is based on the tendency of the enterprise to distribute vs. concentrate wealth.  
Tiers of Enterprise is an internal OSE classification for enterprises. This assessment of Enterprise Tiers is based on the tendency of the enterprise to distribute vs. concentrate power.  
 
=Tier A=


*'''Tier A''': The Big Enterprise. The super-concentrator business-as-usual enterprise. Refers to extreme-performing generators and concentrators of wealth, such as typical outcomes of leading accelerators like [[Y Combinator]]. A good example of a Tier A enterprise is Apple or Google. Such enterprises are:
*'''Tier A''': The Big Enterprise. The super-concentrator business-as-usual enterprise. Refers to extreme-performing generators and concentrators of wealth, such as typical outcomes of leading accelerators like [[Y Combinator]]. A good example of a Tier A enterprise is Apple or Google. Such enterprises are:
Line 12: Line 14:
:*Does not contribute fundamentally to [[Regenerative Development]]
:*Does not contribute fundamentally to [[Regenerative Development]]


*'''Tier B''': The Medium Enterprise. The non-distributors. Business-as-usual enterprise with capital-concentrative tendencies, similar to Tier A but at the million-dollar rather than billion dollar scale budgets.
=Tier B=
*'''Tier B''': The Medium Enterprise. The non-distributors. Business-as-usual enterprise with capital-concentrative tendencies, similar to Tier A but at the 100+ million rather than billion dollar scale budgets.


=Tier C=
*'''Tier C''': The social enterprise. Typically formed to ''serve humanity.''
*'''Tier C''': The social enterprise. Typically formed to ''serve humanity.''
:*May or may not be open source (see [[Open Design]])
:*May or may not be open source (see [[Open Design]])
Line 25: Line 29:
:*May contribute to [[Regenerative Development]]
:*May contribute to [[Regenerative Development]]


*'''Tier D''': The Distributive Enterprise. A social enterprise with an explicit focus of distributing power via [[Open Design]] up to the enterprise design.
=Tier D=
*'''Tier D''': The [[Distributive Enterprise]]. A social enterprise with an explicit focus of distributing power via [[Open Design]] up to the enterprise design.
:*Is open source, [[OSHWA]] and [[FSF]]/[[OSI]] compliant
:*Is open source, [[OSHWA]] and [[FSF]]/[[OSI]] compliant
:*Focuses competitiveness strategy on open, collaborative development
:*Focuses competitiveness strategy on open, collaborative development
Line 35: Line 40:
:*Aims for zero waste within processes by continuous quality improvement
:*Aims for zero waste within processes by continuous quality improvement
:*Is founded on drive for [[Regenerative Development]] of ecosystems and humans
:*Is founded on drive for [[Regenerative Development]] of ecosystems and humans
[[Category:Distributive Enterprise]]

Latest revision as of 13:55, 24 February 2018

Tiers of Enterprise is an internal OSE classification for enterprises. This assessment of Enterprise Tiers is based on the tendency of the enterprise to distribute vs. concentrate power.

Tier A

  • Tier A: The Big Enterprise. The super-concentrator business-as-usual enterprise. Refers to extreme-performing generators and concentrators of wealth, such as typical outcomes of leading accelerators like Y Combinator. A good example of a Tier A enterprise is Apple or Google. Such enterprises are:
  • Closed source at most or all levels, as far as Open Design of their products is concerned in the broad sense
  • Focus on market monopolization as one of their key competitiveness strategies
  • Lead to extreme concentration of wealth, and as a result tend to buy innovation more than to develop innovation
  • Tend to violate human rights of factory workers, and of privacy and choice through the use of their products
  • IP protection is critical to their success. Favor patent protectionism, trade secrets, secrecy, etc in their culture and operations
  • Profit motive drives decision-making
  • Little regard for natural capital
  • 50% waste within processes can be achieved by continuous quality improvement
  • Does not contribute fundamentally to Regenerative Development

Tier B

  • Tier B: The Medium Enterprise. The non-distributors. Business-as-usual enterprise with capital-concentrative tendencies, similar to Tier A but at the 100+ million rather than billion dollar scale budgets.

Tier C

  • Tier C: The social enterprise. Typically formed to serve humanity.
  • May or may not be open source (see Open Design)
  • Focus on serving people as one of their key competitiveness strategies
  • Do not tend to extreme concentration of wealth, as social benefit pre-empts such drive
  • Tend to protect human rights
  • IP protection is not critical to success
  • Social benefit drives decision-making
  • Natural capital is considered
  • 50% waste within processes can be achieved by continuous quality improvement
  • May contribute to Regenerative Development

Tier D

  • Is open source, OSHWA and FSF/OSI compliant
  • Focuses competitiveness strategy on open, collaborative development
  • Tends towards absolute distribution of wealth
  • Tends to improve human rights of self-determination
  • IP protection is antithetical to its operations and goals
  • Skill building and distribution of economic power drives decision-making
  • Natural capital is fundamentally regenerated
  • Aims for zero waste within processes by continuous quality improvement
  • Is founded on drive for Regenerative Development of ecosystems and humans