3D Printer Production Engineering: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Notes= | =Notes= | ||
*Do not use E3D instructions for heat tighttening, they lead to re-do of heat tightening in most cases. | *Do not use E3D instructions for heat tighttening, they lead to re-do of heat tightening in most cases. | ||
* | *I added [[MJ Comment on Heat Tightening]] at the Titan Aero build instructions at https://e3d-online.dozuki.com/Guide/Titan+Aero+Assembly/23. | ||
Revision as of 23:39, 13 March 2019
Notes
- Do not use E3D instructions for heat tighttening, they lead to re-do of heat tightening in most cases.
- I added MJ Comment on Heat Tightening at the Titan Aero build instructions at https://e3d-online.dozuki.com/Guide/Titan+Aero+Assembly/23.
Kits
Based on the notes at Kit Certification - there is a significant value proposition behind distributed production of 3D printer kits based on the OSE 3D printer design.
Our unique value proposition that enables distributed production is that one can build our printer from common, off-the-shelf-parts - and attain industrial performance. This is not the same as Prusa (OS?, Lulzbot (OS), or Jellybox (FOS) - 3 leading printers.
The question remains if distributed quality control can succeed in producing high quality products in a distributed fashion.