Military: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "*USA poll - about 1/3 of the populatyion thanks we are spending too much on the military - [https://news.gallup.com/poll/228137/americans-not-convinced-needs-spend-defense.aspx]") |
(Minor Typo Fix) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*USA poll - about 1/3 of the | *USA poll - about 1/3 of the population thinks we are spending too much on the military - [https://news.gallup.com/poll/228137/americans-not-convinced-needs-spend-defense.aspx] | ||
*Aircraft carriers are acceptable politically due to their high effectiveness to cost ratio - [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2016/09/20/five-reasons-the-navys-aircraft-carriers-are-becoming-more-vital-to-u-s-security/amp/]. However, a good case can be made that they are lucrative and doomed targets due to existing and emerging technology because the affair is asymmetric - [https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/us-navy’s-big-mistake—building-tons-aircraft-carriers-44807?page=0%2C1]. Good case is China launching over 1000 long range missiles at a cost same as a single aircraft carrier. | |||
Latest revision as of 00:08, 16 April 2019
- USA poll - about 1/3 of the population thinks we are spending too much on the military - [1]
- Aircraft carriers are acceptable politically due to their high effectiveness to cost ratio - [2]. However, a good case can be made that they are lucrative and doomed targets due to existing and emerging technology because the affair is asymmetric - [3]. Good case is China launching over 1000 long range missiles at a cost same as a single aircraft carrier.