Revision as of 03:55, 1 May 2020

Future Work

Simplify Universal Axis from clamshell to monolithic for Motor and idlder side.
Retain carriage side, or fix it? Only compelling reason is taking the X axis off. But we could redesign the X so it can be independent of the Y. If we take off X with 2 bolts, service on X or Y allows for whole X and Whole Y to be taken off easily - the Y does not mix with X.

Too much cleanup on X-Y joints. Rework the production engineering so that printing can be by default more clean. Probably do a joint between one-piece motor and one-piece carriage.
- Is any of this due to print settings and/or nozzle size?

Develop FDM 3D Printer Print Profiles for various materials to make it even more plug and play (less, if any failed prints due to the best settings being pre-determined)
D3D Toolchanger and/or D3D Toolheads

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 ==Specific Immediate Items==
 *Simplify Universal Axis from clamshell to monolithic for Motor and idlder side.
-*Retain carriage side, or fix it? Only compelling reason is taking the X axis off. But we could redesign the X so it cna be independent of the Y. If we take off X with 2 bolts, service on X or Y allows for whole X and Whole Y to be taken off easily - the Y does not mix with X.
+*Retain carriage side, or fix it? Only compelling reason is taking the X axis off. But we could redesign the X so it can be independent of the Y. If we take off X with 2 bolts, service on X or Y allows for whole X and Whole Y to be taken off easily - the Y does not mix with X.
 ==Production Engineering==
 *Too much cleanup on X-Y joints. Rework the production engineering so that printing can be by default more clean. Probably do a joint between one-piece motor and one-piece carriage.