Large Covered Structure: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
**For an engineered structure - steel is a good option
**For an engineered structure - steel is a good option
*Wind-shedding is a good option
*Wind-shedding is a good option
=CAD=
==Part Library==
'''Visual History:'''
[[File:v4dirkwinder.png|100px]][[File:v4dirkmotor.png|100px]]
'''Gallery:'''
<gallery perrow=6>
File:v4dirkwinder.png|'''v4 Winder.''' - FreeCAD -[[File:v4dirkwinder.FCStd] - STL - [[File:v4dirkwinder.stl]].
File:v4dirkmotor.png|'''v4 Motor.''' - FreeCAD -[https://gitlab.com/marcin_ose/3d-printed-electric-motor/-/blob/master/v4stackablemotor.FCStd] - STL - [[File:v4dirkmotor.stl]]
</gallery>


=CAD=
=CAD=

Revision as of 01:10, 24 March 2021

Basics

  • This page goes over what is the lowest cost, fastest to build, permanent, but easily disassembled, structure that offers a large working space free from rain, wind, and snow? *This structure should be based on common industrial materials.
    • For an engineered structure - steel is a good option
  • Wind-shedding is a good option

CAD

Part Library

Visual History:


Error creating thumbnail: File missing
Error creating thumbnail: File missing


Gallery:


CAD

Part Library

Working Document

edit

Internal Links

Sourcing

  • Black tee - weld a nut on the tee side and it's a rebar clamp if you thread a set-bolt through the nut - $1.10 [3]