Battery Storage: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
=OSE Notes= | =OSE Notes= | ||
*Available reserves of Lithium, and for that matter nickel in [[Nickel-Iron Batteries]] - are not sufficient to provide energy storage for transportation - with quick first-principle calculations considered. | *Available reserves of Lithium, and for that matter nickel in [[Nickel-Iron Batteries]] - are not sufficient to provide energy storage for transportation - with quick first-principle calculations considered. | ||
*OSE does not promote battery storage for the bulk of humanity's needs - but instead - [[Solar Hydrogen Storage]] |
Revision as of 18:38, 21 April 2022
- 300TWhr of battery storage is necessary to transition to a renewable storage situation [1]
- Question is more important than the answer in the talk above.
- Future should not be about solving one problem after another. It should be something that gets you excited
OSE Notes
- Available reserves of Lithium, and for that matter nickel in Nickel-Iron Batteries - are not sufficient to provide energy storage for transportation - with quick first-principle calculations considered.
- OSE does not promote battery storage for the bulk of humanity's needs - but instead - Solar Hydrogen Storage