Integral Transformative Practice: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*Term appears to be coined by [[Ken Wilber]]. | *Term appears to be coined by [[Ken Wilber]]. | ||
*Critique is that this approach is cognocentric. It favors the mind and heart, excluding physical and instinctual aspects. Here is a a proposal for the next step - [https://nextstepintegral.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/ITP-Jorge-Ferrer.pdf] | *Critique is that this approach is cognocentric. It favors the mind and heart, excluding physical and instinctual aspects. Here is a a proposal for the next step - [https://nextstepintegral.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/ITP-Jorge-Ferrer.pdf] | ||
*And OSE's next step after that adds teleology of abundance, through the [[OSE Psychosocial Integration Model of Change]]. A mouthful, but the [[OSE Abundance Curriculum]] reflects the simple goal of abundance without leaving anyone behind, transcending [[Collective | *And OSE's next step after that adds the teleology of abundance, through the [[OSE Psychosocial Integration Model of Change]]. A mouthful, but the [[OSE Abundance Curriculum]] reflects the simple goal of abundance without leaving anyone behind, transcending various [[Collective Deceptions]] and addressing critiques of both Marxist and capitalist worldviews | ||
Latest revision as of 16:58, 25 August 2023
- Term appears to be coined by Ken Wilber.
- Critique is that this approach is cognocentric. It favors the mind and heart, excluding physical and instinctual aspects. Here is a a proposal for the next step - [1]
- And OSE's next step after that adds the teleology of abundance, through the OSE Psychosocial Integration Model of Change. A mouthful, but the OSE Abundance Curriculum reflects the simple goal of abundance without leaving anyone behind, transcending various Collective Deceptions and addressing critiques of both Marxist and capitalist worldviews