Network Attached Storage: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created Page + Added Basic Sections/Info)
 
(Added some more links under the "Internal Links" section)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=Basics=
=Basics=
*A Data Storage Server for a [[LAN]] (Although if not [[Air Gapped]] can be accessed remotely)
*A Data Storage Server for a [[LAN]] (Although if not [[Air Gapped]] can be accessed remotely)
*Often abbreviated as '''NAS'''
*Useful for a Personal (ie no Monthly Fees short of Cost of Electricity and paying off components) version of [[Cloud Storage]]
*Useful for a Personal (ie no Monthly Fees short of Cost of Electricity and paying off components) version of [[Cloud Storage]]
*Offloads Storage Needs from Smartphones, Laptops, etc while still "keeping" the data
*Offloads Storage Needs from Smartphones, Laptops, etc while still "keeping" the data
*For Group Environments it can allow for high speed data tranfer across the editing team since it is all on a local server, and you can even use high speed networking such as [[10 Gigabit Ethernet]] , as opposed to having to upload/download to a nearby cloud server as fast as your IP allows, and for each pc
*For Group Environments it can allow for high speed data transfer across the editing team since it is all on a local server, and you can even use high speed networking such as [[10 Gigabit Ethernet]] , as opposed to having to upload/download to a nearby cloud server as fast as your IP allows, and for each pc
 
=Example of Speed Advantage=
*[[User: Eric]] Here
*As per [[LibreSpeed]] ,  my local comcast home internet (i think it's coax too, probably [[Hybrid Fiber-Coaxial]] ), going via wifi to my laptop is showing:
**Ping: 23.7 ms
**Jitter: 2.98 ms
**Download: 101Mbps
**Upload: 43.8
*The "latest and greatest" [[Raspberry Pi 5]] based NAS can go 2Gb/s Download, 1.6Gb/s Upload (With [[2.5GB Ethernet]] tested using [[iPerf3]]
**Which according to [https://www.gbmb.org/gbps-to-mbs This Gigabit per second (Gbps) to megabytes per second (MB/s) Calculator] is:
***Download: 2 Gb/ss = 250 MB/s (~ +147% Increase over hypothetical cloud storage)
***Upload: 1.6 Gb/s = 200 MB/s (~ 356% Increase over hypothetical cloud storage)
*So assuming my napkin math is right, one can get a little less than 2x or more the speed of my internet, as well as the cost+privacy and so on benefits
*Would probably be less via wifi.  I think my laptop only has 1gb ethernet, need to check [[Thunderbolt 3 to Ethernet]] options for hypothetical, moreso want the storage than speed demon transfer speeds but worth considering i guess
 
=Options=
==DIY/OS==
===Raspberry Pi NAS===
*Pros: Accessible, About as OS as one can get, Quite Customizable
*Cons: Overall Capacity and Speed (To an extent, becoming less of an issue with each new gen of raspberry pi)
*See [[Raspberry Pi NAS]] For Further Discussion on this
 
===[[Custom PC Building]] Derived===
*Basically you get a bunch of components, but instead of building a [[Workstation PC]] you build your NAS Server from similar parts and put it in a similar [[PC Case]]
*Pros: Can be more Capable (IE [[PCIE Networking Cards]] ,  easy addition of full size [[Optical Disc Drives]] etc)
*Cons: A Bit larger, a bit less Plug and Play / Complexity
 
==OTS Options==
===New===
*Pros: "Fit and Finish", 100% Plug and Play
*Cons: ''Cost'' ,  [[Bloatware]] / [[Planned Obsolescence]] of any Software/Firmware Support, not as Customized to Your Needs
 
===Misc Details===
*Used is a potential route, granted quality, what it was used for, and choices are an issue (makes the cost more comprable to DIY/OS Options Though
*Often with New options there is a choice of with/without drives; you can self source as well
*Used don't really come with drives so that must be taken into consideration too


=Internal Links=
=Internal Links=
*
*[[RAID Array]] (A method of redundant multi-disc storage often used in NAS devices, which can also be used as a standalone [[External Drive]] in theory via [[USB-C]] or [[Thunderbolt 3]] etc)
*[[Open Source Network Attached Storage Unit]]
**[[Raspberry Pi NAS]]


=External Links=
=External Links=
*
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network-attached_storage The Wikipedia Page on Network Attatched Storage]

Latest revision as of 21:31, 23 April 2024

Basics

  • A Data Storage Server for a LAN (Although if not Air Gapped can be accessed remotely)
  • Often abbreviated as NAS
  • Useful for a Personal (ie no Monthly Fees short of Cost of Electricity and paying off components) version of Cloud Storage
  • Offloads Storage Needs from Smartphones, Laptops, etc while still "keeping" the data
  • For Group Environments it can allow for high speed data transfer across the editing team since it is all on a local server, and you can even use high speed networking such as 10 Gigabit Ethernet , as opposed to having to upload/download to a nearby cloud server as fast as your IP allows, and for each pc

Example of Speed Advantage

  • User: Eric Here
  • As per LibreSpeed , my local comcast home internet (i think it's coax too, probably Hybrid Fiber-Coaxial ), going via wifi to my laptop is showing:
    • Ping: 23.7 ms
    • Jitter: 2.98 ms
    • Download: 101Mbps
    • Upload: 43.8
  • The "latest and greatest" Raspberry Pi 5 based NAS can go 2Gb/s Download, 1.6Gb/s Upload (With 2.5GB Ethernet tested using iPerf3
  • So assuming my napkin math is right, one can get a little less than 2x or more the speed of my internet, as well as the cost+privacy and so on benefits
  • Would probably be less via wifi. I think my laptop only has 1gb ethernet, need to check Thunderbolt 3 to Ethernet options for hypothetical, moreso want the storage than speed demon transfer speeds but worth considering i guess

Options

DIY/OS

Raspberry Pi NAS

  • Pros: Accessible, About as OS as one can get, Quite Customizable
  • Cons: Overall Capacity and Speed (To an extent, becoming less of an issue with each new gen of raspberry pi)
  • See Raspberry Pi NAS For Further Discussion on this

Custom PC Building Derived

  • Basically you get a bunch of components, but instead of building a Workstation PC you build your NAS Server from similar parts and put it in a similar PC Case
  • Pros: Can be more Capable (IE PCIE Networking Cards , easy addition of full size Optical Disc Drives etc)
  • Cons: A Bit larger, a bit less Plug and Play / Complexity

OTS Options

New

  • Pros: "Fit and Finish", 100% Plug and Play
  • Cons: Cost , Bloatware / Planned Obsolescence of any Software/Firmware Support, not as Customized to Your Needs

Misc Details

  • Used is a potential route, granted quality, what it was used for, and choices are an issue (makes the cost more comprable to DIY/OS Options Though
  • Often with New options there is a choice of with/without drives; you can self source as well
  • Used don't really come with drives so that must be taken into consideration too

Internal Links

External Links