Network Attached Storage: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added an external link)
(Added some more links under the "Internal Links" section)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=Basics=
=Basics=
*A Data Storage Server for a [[LAN]] (Although if not [[Air Gapped]] can be accessed remotely)
*A Data Storage Server for a [[LAN]] (Although if not [[Air Gapped]] can be accessed remotely)
*Often abbreviated as '''NAS'''
*Useful for a Personal (ie no Monthly Fees short of Cost of Electricity and paying off components) version of [[Cloud Storage]]
*Useful for a Personal (ie no Monthly Fees short of Cost of Electricity and paying off components) version of [[Cloud Storage]]
*Offloads Storage Needs from Smartphones, Laptops, etc while still "keeping" the data
*Offloads Storage Needs from Smartphones, Laptops, etc while still "keeping" the data
*For Group Environments it can allow for high speed data tranfer across the editing team since it is all on a local server, and you can even use high speed networking such as [[10 Gigabit Ethernet]] , as opposed to having to upload/download to a nearby cloud server as fast as your IP allows, and for each pc
*For Group Environments it can allow for high speed data transfer across the editing team since it is all on a local server, and you can even use high speed networking such as [[10 Gigabit Ethernet]] , as opposed to having to upload/download to a nearby cloud server as fast as your IP allows, and for each pc
 
=Example of Speed Advantage=
*[[User: Eric]] Here
*As per [[LibreSpeed]] ,  my local comcast home internet (i think it's coax too, probably [[Hybrid Fiber-Coaxial]] ), going via wifi to my laptop is showing:
**Ping: 23.7 ms
**Jitter: 2.98 ms
**Download: 101Mbps
**Upload: 43.8
*The "latest and greatest" [[Raspberry Pi 5]] based NAS can go 2Gb/s Download, 1.6Gb/s Upload (With [[2.5GB Ethernet]] tested using [[iPerf3]]
**Which according to [https://www.gbmb.org/gbps-to-mbs This Gigabit per second (Gbps) to megabytes per second (MB/s) Calculator] is:
***Download: 2 Gb/ss = 250 MB/s (~ +147% Increase over hypothetical cloud storage)
***Upload: 1.6 Gb/s = 200 MB/s (~ 356% Increase over hypothetical cloud storage)
*So assuming my napkin math is right, one can get a little less than 2x or more the speed of my internet, as well as the cost+privacy and so on benefits
*Would probably be less via wifi.  I think my laptop only has 1gb ethernet, need to check [[Thunderbolt 3 to Ethernet]] options for hypothetical, moreso want the storage than speed demon transfer speeds but worth considering i guess
 
=Options=
==DIY/OS==
===Raspberry Pi NAS===
*Pros: Accessible, About as OS as one can get, Quite Customizable
*Cons: Overall Capacity and Speed (To an extent, becoming less of an issue with each new gen of raspberry pi)
*See [[Raspberry Pi NAS]] For Further Discussion on this
 
===[[Custom PC Building]] Derived===
*Basically you get a bunch of components, but instead of building a [[Workstation PC]] you build your NAS Server from similar parts and put it in a similar [[PC Case]]
*Pros: Can be more Capable (IE [[PCIE Networking Cards]] ,  easy addition of full size [[Optical Disc Drives]] etc)
*Cons: A Bit larger, a bit less Plug and Play / Complexity
 
==OTS Options==
===New===
*Pros: "Fit and Finish", 100% Plug and Play
*Cons: ''Cost'' ,  [[Bloatware]] / [[Planned Obsolescence]] of any Software/Firmware Support, not as Customized to Your Needs
 
===Misc Details===
*Used is a potential route, granted quality, what it was used for, and choices are an issue (makes the cost more comprable to DIY/OS Options Though
*Often with New options there is a choice of with/without drives; you can self source as well
*Used don't really come with drives so that must be taken into consideration too


=Internal Links=
=Internal Links=
*
*[[RAID Array]] (A method of redundant multi-disc storage often used in NAS devices, which can also be used as a standalone [[External Drive]] in theory via [[USB-C]] or [[Thunderbolt 3]] etc)
*[[Open Source Network Attached Storage Unit]]
**[[Raspberry Pi NAS]]


=External Links=
=External Links=
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network-attached_storage The Wikipedia Page on Network Attatched Storage]
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network-attached_storage The Wikipedia Page on Network Attatched Storage]

Latest revision as of 21:31, 23 April 2024

Basics

  • A Data Storage Server for a LAN (Although if not Air Gapped can be accessed remotely)
  • Often abbreviated as NAS
  • Useful for a Personal (ie no Monthly Fees short of Cost of Electricity and paying off components) version of Cloud Storage
  • Offloads Storage Needs from Smartphones, Laptops, etc while still "keeping" the data
  • For Group Environments it can allow for high speed data transfer across the editing team since it is all on a local server, and you can even use high speed networking such as 10 Gigabit Ethernet , as opposed to having to upload/download to a nearby cloud server as fast as your IP allows, and for each pc

Example of Speed Advantage

  • User: Eric Here
  • As per LibreSpeed , my local comcast home internet (i think it's coax too, probably Hybrid Fiber-Coaxial ), going via wifi to my laptop is showing:
    • Ping: 23.7 ms
    • Jitter: 2.98 ms
    • Download: 101Mbps
    • Upload: 43.8
  • The "latest and greatest" Raspberry Pi 5 based NAS can go 2Gb/s Download, 1.6Gb/s Upload (With 2.5GB Ethernet tested using iPerf3
  • So assuming my napkin math is right, one can get a little less than 2x or more the speed of my internet, as well as the cost+privacy and so on benefits
  • Would probably be less via wifi. I think my laptop only has 1gb ethernet, need to check Thunderbolt 3 to Ethernet options for hypothetical, moreso want the storage than speed demon transfer speeds but worth considering i guess

Options

DIY/OS

Raspberry Pi NAS

  • Pros: Accessible, About as OS as one can get, Quite Customizable
  • Cons: Overall Capacity and Speed (To an extent, becoming less of an issue with each new gen of raspberry pi)
  • See Raspberry Pi NAS For Further Discussion on this

Custom PC Building Derived

  • Basically you get a bunch of components, but instead of building a Workstation PC you build your NAS Server from similar parts and put it in a similar PC Case
  • Pros: Can be more Capable (IE PCIE Networking Cards , easy addition of full size Optical Disc Drives etc)
  • Cons: A Bit larger, a bit less Plug and Play / Complexity

OTS Options

New

  • Pros: "Fit and Finish", 100% Plug and Play
  • Cons: Cost , Bloatware / Planned Obsolescence of any Software/Firmware Support, not as Customized to Your Needs

Misc Details

  • Used is a potential route, granted quality, what it was used for, and choices are an issue (makes the cost more comprable to DIY/OS Options Though
  • Often with New options there is a choice of with/without drives; you can self source as well
  • Used don't really come with drives so that must be taken into consideration too

Internal Links

External Links