Apprenticeship Collaborative Social Technology: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*'''Impossible Project''' - for your thesis, you do an impossible project. Such as a hydrogen filling station for every home. There is plenty of space in the USA for this (8 acres per person), and the space requirement is only such that 300 gallons equivalent are required for 15k miles per year (50 mpg). However, hydrogen is supposed to be here only in 2050 [https://www.irena.org/Digital-Report/Geopolitics-of-the-Energy-Transformation#:~:text=The%20climate%20change%20imperative%20has,and%20carbon%20capture%20and%20storage.], so this is a good impossible challenge. | *'''Impossible Project''' - for your thesis, you do an impossible project. Such as a hydrogen filling station for every home. There is plenty of space in the USA for this (8 acres per person), and the space requirement is only such that 300 gallons equivalent are required for 15k miles per year (50 mpg). However, hydrogen is supposed to be here only in 2050 [https://www.irena.org/Digital-Report/Geopolitics-of-the-Energy-Transformation#:~:text=The%20climate%20change%20imperative%20has,and%20carbon%20capture%20and%20storage.], so this is a good impossible challenge. | ||
*'''Burndown and Pairing''' - [[Individual Skill Burndown]] +[[Integrated Skill Burndown]] measures productive performance. Once data points start coming in, top performer is paired with a bottom performer. We observd how 'best practice' (top performer) can lead to more rapid diffusion to the bottom performer. Can we measure this in the [[Individual Skill Burndown]], and is this also visible in the [[Integrated Skill Burndown]]? | *'''Burndown and Pairing''' - [[Individual Skill Burndown]] +[[Integrated Skill Burndown]] measures productive performance. Once data points start coming in, top performer is paired with a bottom performer. We observd how 'best practice' (top performer) can lead to more rapid diffusion to the bottom performer. Can we measure this in the [[Individual Skill Burndown]], and is this also visible in the [[Integrated Skill Burndown]]? | ||
*'''Character''' - Log of tribulations and decisions, reflecting on proud moments of defining one's values. This is based on character studies from [[Road to Character]] | *'''Character''' - Log of tribulations and decisions, reflecting on proud moments of defining one's values. This is based on character studies from [[The Road to Character]] book. | ||
*'''Harkness''' - | *'''Harkness''' - | ||
*'''Teaching''' - | *'''Teaching''' - |
Revision as of 19:36, 13 August 2024
- Impossible Project - for your thesis, you do an impossible project. Such as a hydrogen filling station for every home. There is plenty of space in the USA for this (8 acres per person), and the space requirement is only such that 300 gallons equivalent are required for 15k miles per year (50 mpg). However, hydrogen is supposed to be here only in 2050 [1], so this is a good impossible challenge.
- Burndown and Pairing - Individual Skill Burndown +Integrated Skill Burndown measures productive performance. Once data points start coming in, top performer is paired with a bottom performer. We observd how 'best practice' (top performer) can lead to more rapid diffusion to the bottom performer. Can we measure this in the Individual Skill Burndown, and is this also visible in the Integrated Skill Burndown?
- Character - Log of tribulations and decisions, reflecting on proud moments of defining one's values. This is based on character studies from The Road to Character book.
- Harkness -
- Teaching -
- Leaders - collaboration, democracy, transparency, Education, health (energy management), energy, algorithms, IT, Open Culture, History, Science, Technology, etc. The rule is you can't teach what you are best at, only if you suck at something. Meaning that you have to increase your learning ability by having to teach, and is overall a faster way to learn by the Principle of Necessity.