Micropower: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created Page + Added Basic Sections/Info) |
(Added some more information) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Basics= | =Basics= | ||
*Devices utilizing small generators that produce electrical power of ~1-10 [[Watts]] | *Devices utilizing small fuel powered generators that produce electrical power of ~1-10 [[Watts]] | ||
*They utilize [[Micro Fuel Cell]]s, [[Micro TEC]s, [[Micro Turbine]]s, and [[Micro ICE]]s | *They utilize [[Micro Fuel Cell]]s, [[Micro TEC]]s, [[Micro Turbine]]s, and [[Micro ICE]]s | ||
They can power small electronic devices such as smart phones | *They can power small conventional electronic devices such as smart phones and computers via a cable, or be integrated into speciality devices designed around Micropower Generators | ||
=Uses= | =Uses= | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*[[Open Source Fuels Construction Set]] | *[[Open Source Fuels Construction Set]] | ||
= | =Background= | ||
==Historical Origin== | |||
*The idea originated in the 80’s/90’s in NATO Countries along the development aims of the [[Single Fuel Standard]] | |||
*The idea was essentially to have Soldiers’ Radios, Jammers, GPS Navigators, or Batlefield Computers etc run on the same [[JP-5]] / [[JP-8]] as everything else | |||
*The idea could be made SLIGHTLY more “sane” by a larger worn device powering all the equipment on said person via a [[Wiring Harness]] of sorts combined into the [[Backpack Frame]] or Outerwear itself etc | |||
**RE: [[Passive Exoskeleton]] and [[Active Exoskeleton]] especially | |||
***Although the advantage of this level of tech on a per-soldier level vs sticking them all in a (potentially cheaper) APC/IFV etc is debatable (despite the latter being far less “sci-fi” ) | |||
***IE instead of Per-Soldier Bullet Direction Finding, Navigation, Comms, EW, and such…you just have that powered by the GIANT DIESEL TRUCK ENGINE… | |||
*The concept faded though with the proliferation of more energy efficient/smaller electronic devices, and the [[Lithium Ion Battery]] | |||
**To a lesser extent reliable [[Alkaline Batteries]] and [[Disposable Lithium Batteries]] too | |||
==Potential Resurgence== | |||
*Several factors may make the pursuit of the technology worthwhile again, while at the same time making it more “workable” | |||
*1.) As per the Russian Invasion of Ukraine, short of expensive vehicles with MASSIVE Active Protection System + SHORAD investments (and things such as Net Protected Roads/Tunnel Networks, vehicles are vulnerable and Force Dispersion is a requirement | |||
*2.) Logistics are Strained | |||
**Although Micropower wouldn’t be “pure” of this/Fuel Logistics still suffer | |||
*3.) UAVs, UGVs, Coms, and EW Requirements raise the need for Energy, while Battery Technology is advancing less explosively | |||
*4.) While the cost argument/tradeoffs vs PROPER mechanization still exist, the per-person loads, and COTS solutions, are making exoskeletons more viable | |||
*5.) Simpler options such as [[SOFCs]] exist that are far less “Kerbal” than Chip Scale Gas Turbines, or everyone having a Rotary Engine]] buzzing away on their backpack | |||
**Also like batteries they are silent | |||
***For example consider Early Boston Dynamics to Modern (Battery Electric) Spot | |||
=Internal Links= | |||
*[[Open Source Micropower Construction Set]] | *[[Open Source Micropower Construction Set]] | ||
*[[Microfluidic Hydrogen Production Chip]] | *[[Microfluidic Hydrogen Production Chip]] | ||
= | =External Links= | ||
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micropower The Wikipedia Page on Micropower] | *[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micropower The Wikipedia Page on Micropower] | ||
Latest revision as of 01:57, 12 January 2026
Basics
- Devices utilizing small fuel powered generators that produce electrical power of ~1-10 Watts
- They utilize Micro Fuel Cells, Micro TECs, Micro Turbines, and Micro ICEs
- They can power small conventional electronic devices such as smart phones and computers via a cable, or be integrated into speciality devices designed around Micropower Generators
Uses
Background
Historical Origin
- The idea originated in the 80’s/90’s in NATO Countries along the development aims of the Single Fuel Standard
- The idea was essentially to have Soldiers’ Radios, Jammers, GPS Navigators, or Batlefield Computers etc run on the same JP-5 / JP-8 as everything else
- The idea could be made SLIGHTLY more “sane” by a larger worn device powering all the equipment on said person via a Wiring Harness of sorts combined into the Backpack Frame or Outerwear itself etc
- RE: Passive Exoskeleton and Active Exoskeleton especially
- Although the advantage of this level of tech on a per-soldier level vs sticking them all in a (potentially cheaper) APC/IFV etc is debatable (despite the latter being far less “sci-fi” )
- IE instead of Per-Soldier Bullet Direction Finding, Navigation, Comms, EW, and such…you just have that powered by the GIANT DIESEL TRUCK ENGINE…
- RE: Passive Exoskeleton and Active Exoskeleton especially
- The concept faded though with the proliferation of more energy efficient/smaller electronic devices, and the Lithium Ion Battery
- To a lesser extent reliable Alkaline Batteries and Disposable Lithium Batteries too
Potential Resurgence
- Several factors may make the pursuit of the technology worthwhile again, while at the same time making it more “workable”
- 1.) As per the Russian Invasion of Ukraine, short of expensive vehicles with MASSIVE Active Protection System + SHORAD investments (and things such as Net Protected Roads/Tunnel Networks, vehicles are vulnerable and Force Dispersion is a requirement
- 2.) Logistics are Strained
- Although Micropower wouldn’t be “pure” of this/Fuel Logistics still suffer
- 3.) UAVs, UGVs, Coms, and EW Requirements raise the need for Energy, while Battery Technology is advancing less explosively
- 4.) While the cost argument/tradeoffs vs PROPER mechanization still exist, the per-person loads, and COTS solutions, are making exoskeletons more viable
- 5.) Simpler options such as SOFCs exist that are far less “Kerbal” than Chip Scale Gas Turbines, or everyone having a Rotary Engine]] buzzing away on their backpack
- Also like batteries they are silent
- For example consider Early Boston Dynamics to Modern (Battery Electric) Spot
- Also like batteries they are silent