Micropower: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Minor Text Formating Fix)
(Added some more information)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=Basics=
=Basics=
*Devices utilizing small generators that produce electrical power of ~1-10 [[Watts]]
*Devices utilizing small fuel powered generators that produce electrical power of ~1-10 [[Watts]]
*They utilize [[Micro Fuel Cell]]s, [[Micro TEC]]s, [[Micro Turbine]]s, and [[Micro ICE]]s
*They utilize [[Micro Fuel Cell]]s, [[Micro TEC]]s, [[Micro Turbine]]s, and [[Micro ICE]]s
They can power small electronic devices such as smart phones, computers, or speciality devices using conventional gas or liquid fuels
*They can power small conventional electronic devices such as smart phones and computers via a cable, or be integrated into speciality devices designed around Micropower Generators


=Uses=
=Uses=
Line 8: Line 8:
*[[Open Source Fuels Construction Set]]
*[[Open Source Fuels Construction Set]]


=See Also=
=Background=
==Historical Origin==
*The idea originated in the 80’s/90’s in NATO Countries along the development aims of the [[Single Fuel Standard]]
*The idea was essentially to have Soldiers’ Radios, Jammers, GPS Navigators, or Batlefield Computers etc run on the same [[JP-5]] / [[JP-8]] as everything else
*The idea could be made SLIGHTLY more “sane” by a larger worn device powering all the equipment on said person via a [[Wiring Harness]] of sorts combined into the [[Backpack Frame]] or Outerwear itself etc
**RE: [[Passive Exoskeleton]] and [[Active Exoskeleton]] especially
***Although the advantage of this level of tech on a per-soldier level vs sticking them all in a (potentially cheaper) APC/IFV etc is debatable (despite the latter being far less “sci-fi” )
***IE instead of Per-Soldier Bullet Direction Finding, Navigation, Comms, EW, and such…you just have that powered by the GIANT DIESEL TRUCK ENGINE…
*The concept faded though with the proliferation of more energy efficient/smaller electronic devices, and the [[Lithium Ion Battery]]
**To a lesser extent reliable [[Alkaline Batteries]] and [[Disposable Lithium Batteries]] too
 
==Potential Resurgence==
*Several factors may make the pursuit of the technology worthwhile again, while at the same time making it more “workable”
*1.) As per the Russian Invasion of Ukraine, short of expensive vehicles with MASSIVE Active Protection System + SHORAD investments (and things such as Net Protected Roads/Tunnel Networks, vehicles are vulnerable and Force Dispersion is a requirement
*2.) Logistics are Strained
**Although Micropower wouldn’t be “pure” of this/Fuel Logistics still suffer
*3.) UAVs, UGVs, Coms, and EW Requirements raise the need for Energy, while Battery Technology is advancing less explosively
*4.) While the cost argument/tradeoffs vs PROPER mechanization still exist, the per-person loads, and COTS solutions, are making exoskeletons more viable
*5.) Simpler options such as [[SOFCs]] exist that are far less “Kerbal” than Chip Scale Gas Turbines, or everyone having a Rotary Engine]] buzzing away on their backpack
**Also like batteries they are silent
***For example consider Early Boston Dynamics to Modern (Battery Electric) Spot
 
=Internal Links=
*[[Open Source Micropower Construction Set]]
*[[Open Source Micropower Construction Set]]
*[[Microfluidic Hydrogen Production Chip]]
*[[Microfluidic Hydrogen Production Chip]]


=Useful Link=
=External Links=
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micropower The Wikipedia Page on Micropower]
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micropower The Wikipedia Page on Micropower]

Latest revision as of 01:57, 12 January 2026

Basics

  • Devices utilizing small fuel powered generators that produce electrical power of ~1-10 Watts
  • They utilize Micro Fuel Cells, Micro TECs, Micro Turbines, and Micro ICEs
  • They can power small conventional electronic devices such as smart phones and computers via a cable, or be integrated into speciality devices designed around Micropower Generators

Uses

Background

Historical Origin

  • The idea originated in the 80’s/90’s in NATO Countries along the development aims of the Single Fuel Standard
  • The idea was essentially to have Soldiers’ Radios, Jammers, GPS Navigators, or Batlefield Computers etc run on the same JP-5 / JP-8 as everything else
  • The idea could be made SLIGHTLY more “sane” by a larger worn device powering all the equipment on said person via a Wiring Harness of sorts combined into the Backpack Frame or Outerwear itself etc
    • RE: Passive Exoskeleton and Active Exoskeleton especially
      • Although the advantage of this level of tech on a per-soldier level vs sticking them all in a (potentially cheaper) APC/IFV etc is debatable (despite the latter being far less “sci-fi” )
      • IE instead of Per-Soldier Bullet Direction Finding, Navigation, Comms, EW, and such…you just have that powered by the GIANT DIESEL TRUCK ENGINE…
  • The concept faded though with the proliferation of more energy efficient/smaller electronic devices, and the Lithium Ion Battery

Potential Resurgence

  • Several factors may make the pursuit of the technology worthwhile again, while at the same time making it more “workable”
  • 1.) As per the Russian Invasion of Ukraine, short of expensive vehicles with MASSIVE Active Protection System + SHORAD investments (and things such as Net Protected Roads/Tunnel Networks, vehicles are vulnerable and Force Dispersion is a requirement
  • 2.) Logistics are Strained
    • Although Micropower wouldn’t be “pure” of this/Fuel Logistics still suffer
  • 3.) UAVs, UGVs, Coms, and EW Requirements raise the need for Energy, while Battery Technology is advancing less explosively
  • 4.) While the cost argument/tradeoffs vs PROPER mechanization still exist, the per-person loads, and COTS solutions, are making exoskeletons more viable
  • 5.) Simpler options such as SOFCs exist that are far less “Kerbal” than Chip Scale Gas Turbines, or everyone having a Rotary Engine]] buzzing away on their backpack
    • Also like batteries they are silent
      • For example consider Early Boston Dynamics to Modern (Battery Electric) Spot

Internal Links

External Links