Talk:Nickel-Iron Battery/Research Development: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "Very good research work. Love the notes and analysis. A minor suggestion is to clean up links like http://www.nickel-iron-battery.com/ by putting them in brackets like this: [h...") |
Wesley bruce (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Very good research work. Love the notes and analysis. A minor suggestion is to clean up links like http://www.nickel-iron-battery.com/ by putting them in brackets like this: [http://www.nickel-iron-battery.com/]. Most of the URLs cited are not human memorable anyways, so why take up screen space with them? The "footnote" form of the links provided by MediaWiki is a good feature. - [[Mark J Norton]] | Very good research work. Love the notes and analysis. A minor suggestion is to clean up links like http://www.nickel-iron-battery.com/ by putting them in brackets like this: [http://www.nickel-iron-battery.com/]. Most of the URLs cited are not human memorable anyways, so why take up screen space with them? The "footnote" form of the links provided by MediaWiki is a good feature. - [[Mark J Norton]] | ||
---- | |||
Punctuation needs to be redone by the author of the last edit. There is none and it makes it difficult to tell where sentences start or finish. There are also spelling error that are in decipherable. The author needs to have a go at learning what capitalisation full stops and word spacing is all about. Otherwise its excellent research but I'm having trouble following it. [[User:Wesley bruce|Wesley bruce]] 20:07, 17 July 2011 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 03:07, 18 July 2011
Very good research work. Love the notes and analysis. A minor suggestion is to clean up links like http://www.nickel-iron-battery.com/ by putting them in brackets like this: [1]. Most of the URLs cited are not human memorable anyways, so why take up screen space with them? The "footnote" form of the links provided by MediaWiki is a good feature. - Mark J Norton
Punctuation needs to be redone by the author of the last edit. There is none and it makes it difficult to tell where sentences start or finish. There are also spelling error that are in decipherable. The author needs to have a go at learning what capitalisation full stops and word spacing is all about. Otherwise its excellent research but I'm having trouble following it. Wesley bruce 20:07, 17 July 2011 (PDT)