Design Guide Students: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
*To score your peer - give a number of points for each question, along with an explanation of what was missing from the answer.
*To score your peer - give a number of points for each question, along with an explanation of what was missing from the answer.
*The goal is achieving a transparent process for evaluating students
*The goal is achieving a transparent process for evaluating students
=Student List=
*Write down your name here, email, and numbers of all the 19 [[Design Guide]] lessons you have taken (such as 1, 5, 10 for lessons 1, 5, 10).
#
#
#
#
=Pairing List=
*Pair up with a peer for evaluation as described in the Introduction
Pairs:
#
#
#
#
=Evaluations=
*This is absolutely transparent and public to foster rapid learning.
*Write down the questions and answers here. The questions are in the Peer Evaluation section at the end of each design guide.
*For the person evaluating - comment why you gave the score that you did.
*Start a subsection here (content between 2 equal signs <nowiki>== ==</nowiki>) for each peer review pair.
*When this page gets too long, just start on another page, such as <nowiki>[[Marcin + Catarina Evaluation of Lesson 3]]</nowiki>
*You can categorize your evaluations to get an overall evaluation by putting all your evaluations (which may be with different people) under a category, such as <nowiki>[[Category:Marcin's Evalution for the OSE Design Guide]]</nowiki>
[[Category:Design Guide]]

Latest revision as of 17:32, 11 November 2020


HintLightbulb.png Hint: See Design Guide for the actual lessons

Intro

  • If you are interested in being peer-evaluated for your competency on any topic presented in the OSE Design Guide - please put yourself down below, along with your email and the lessons you took
  • Then pair yourself up in the Pairing section - to a peer who has taken the same lesson by emailing your peer with interest in peer evaluation
  • Your peer with then give you a grade from 0-100%, with 100% being a perfect score.
  • To score your peer - give a number of points for each question, along with an explanation of what was missing from the answer.
  • The goal is achieving a transparent process for evaluating students

Student List

  • Write down your name here, email, and numbers of all the 19 Design Guide lessons you have taken (such as 1, 5, 10 for lessons 1, 5, 10).

Pairing List

  • Pair up with a peer for evaluation as described in the Introduction

Pairs:

Evaluations

  • This is absolutely transparent and public to foster rapid learning.
  • Write down the questions and answers here. The questions are in the Peer Evaluation section at the end of each design guide.
  • For the person evaluating - comment why you gave the score that you did.
  • Start a subsection here (content between 2 equal signs == ==) for each peer review pair.
  • When this page gets too long, just start on another page, such as [[Marcin + Catarina Evaluation of Lesson 3]]
  • You can categorize your evaluations to get an overall evaluation by putting all your evaluations (which may be with different people) under a category, such as [[Category:Marcin's Evalution for the OSE Design Guide]]