|
|
(11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | {{OrigLang}} |
| | |
| | |
| <HTML> | | <HTML> |
| <HEAD> | | <HEAD> |
Line 5: |
Line 8: |
| <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="LibreOffice 3.3 (Unix)"> | | <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="LibreOffice 3.3 (Unix)"> |
| <META NAME="AUTHOR" CONTENT="Marcin "> | | <META NAME="AUTHOR" CONTENT="Marcin "> |
| <META NAME="CREATED" CONTENT="20111223;17353600"> | | <META NAME="CREATED" CONTENT="20111226;314200"> |
| <META NAME="CHANGEDBY" CONTENT="Marcin "> | | <META NAME="CHANGEDBY" CONTENT="Marcin "> |
| <META NAME="CHANGED" CONTENT="20111224;19231300"> | | <META NAME="CHANGED" CONTENT="20111226;315900"> |
| <STYLE TYPE="text/css"> | | <STYLE TYPE="text/css"> |
| <!-- | | <!-- |
Line 22: |
Line 25: |
| Jakubowski, Ph.D., 12.24.2011</FONT></FONT></P> | | Jakubowski, Ph.D., 12.24.2011</FONT></FONT></P> |
| <P ALIGN=CENTER STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-weight: normal"><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=2 STYLE="font-size: 9pt">part | | <P ALIGN=CENTER STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-weight: normal"><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=2 STYLE="font-size: 9pt">part |
| of the OSE Christmas Gift to the World</FONT></FONT></P> | | of the OSE Christmas Gift to the World of 2011</FONT></FONT></P> |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR> | | <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR> |
| </P> | | </P> |
Line 34: |
Line 37: |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR> | | <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR> |
| </P> | | </P> |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">OSE is a movement | | <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">Open Source Ecology (OSE) is a movement |
| to create the open source economy. The movement consists of hundreds | | to create the open source economy. The movement consists of hundreds |
| of entrepreneurs, producers, engineers, makers, and supporters around | | of entrepreneurs, producers, engineers, makers, and supporters around |
Line 43: |
Line 46: |
| technological systems – as they interact along </FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000"><I>open</I></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000"> | | technological systems – as they interact along </FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000"><I>open</I></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000"> |
| principles. Read a further description of the OSE concept as it was | | principles. Read a further description of the OSE concept as it was |
| formulated initially in 2003 (see Appendix). Since then, the concept | | formulated initially in 2003 (see Appendix below). Since then, the concept |
| has evolved to a platform for creating distributive enterprise, as a | | has evolved to a platform for creating distributive enterprise, as a |
| solid foundation for a sound economy - a third economic option beyond | | solid foundation for a sound economy - a third economic option beyond |
Line 88: |
Line 91: |
| As a result of lowered barriers to entry, each community can increase | | As a result of lowered barriers to entry, each community can increase |
| the range of products and services that it can provide. Global | | the range of products and services that it can provide. Global |
| collaboration in open product an d process design leads to best | | collaboration in open product and process design leads to best |
| practices being commonly available. This is opposed to the dominant | | practices being commonly available. This is opposed to the dominant |
| paradigm of today – where a few companies having the best products | | paradigm of today – where a few companies having the best products |
Line 207: |
Line 210: |
| See the notions of </SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">open</SPAN></I></FONT></FONT></FONT><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal"> | | See the notions of </SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">open</SPAN></I></FONT></FONT></FONT><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal"> |
| at the Shuttleworth Foundation - | | at the Shuttleworth Foundation - |
| </SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT><A HREF="http://www.shuttleworthfoundation.org/about-us/our-philosophy/open-reporting/"><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">http://www.shuttleworthfoundation.org/about-us/our-philosophy/open-reporting/</SPAN></SPAN></A></P> | | </SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT><A HREF="http://www.shuttleworthfoundation.org/about-us/our-philosophy/communication/"><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">http://www.shuttleworthfoundation.org/about-us/our-philosophy/communication/</SPAN></SPAN></A></P> |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal"> | | <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal"> |
| <BR> | | <BR> |
Line 318: |
Line 321: |
| transparency - the cost of labor goes down – as the user can also | | transparency - the cost of labor goes down – as the user can also |
| learn to be the producer. In the limit of DIY ethic, this cost, | | learn to be the producer. In the limit of DIY ethic, this cost, |
| defined as external cost - goes to zero – and is replaced by one's | | defined as cost of external labor - goes to zero – and is replaced |
| time. Further, in the limit of lifetime-design products, the time | | by one's time. Further, in the limit of lifetime-design products, the |
| | </SPAN></SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">time |
| required for production is minimized, as production has to happen | | required for production is minimized, as production has to happen |
| only once. Thus, competitiveness </SPAN></SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style: normal"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">with | | only once. Thus, competitiveness with globalization is achieved by |
| global players is achieved by zero access barriers and local skill,
| | zero access barriers and local skill, and local social capital – a |
| and local social capital – a different paradigm. </SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT> | | different paradigm. </SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT> |
| </P> | | </P> |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal"> | | <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal"> |
Line 360: |
Line 364: |
| draftsman is not the engineer, the engineer is not the fabricator, | | draftsman is not the engineer, the engineer is not the fabricator, |
| the fabricator is not the user, and the user is not the repairman. | | the fabricator is not the user, and the user is not the repairman. |
| While is is touted as the pinnacle of specialization, this introduces | | While it is touted as the pinnacle of specialization, this introduces |
| a lack of accountability between all these steps, and therefore, | | a lack of accountability between all these steps, and therefore, |
| inferior product design when considered from the human ergonomic | | inferior product design when considered from the human ergonomic |
Line 372: |
Line 376: |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><B>Environmental | | <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><B>Environmental |
| Regeneration </B><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">– There is a | | Regeneration </B><SPAN STYLE="font-weight: normal">– There is a |
| direct link between open source technology and environmentalism. Open | | direct link between open source technology and environmental |
| technology implies optimal technology – and one part of | | integrity. Open technology implies optimal technology – and one |
| optimization is optimization for environmental friendliness. Thus, | | part of optimization is optimization for environmental friendliness. |
| the trend of environmental degradation can be reversed to | | Thus, the trend of environmental degradation can be reversed to |
| environmental regeneration.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| | regeneration.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></P> |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><B>PART
| |
| II</B></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><B>Tactical
| |
| Approach</B></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>To
| |
| create an open source economy, we are starting this a small but
| |
| sufficient subset, the GVCS 50. By developing the GVCS technology
| |
| kernel, we enable the community-based solution of relocalized
| |
| production. Because the GVCS tools are selected based on their large
| |
| economic significance, this has widespread applications – such as
| |
| enterprise startup, regeneration of urban decay, and building of
| |
| communities – both in the developed and developing world. Because
| |
| the GVCS is comprehensive, it is designed to provide a robust
| |
| solution for rebuilding communities from the ground up.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><B>Rollout
| |
| Plan</B></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>We
| |
| currently have $1/2M of funding to begin rapid parallel development
| |
| of the GVCS, with development of 14 further tools starting January 1,
| |
| 2012. We aim to produce beta product releases of most of these tools
| |
| by April 1, 2012. From then, we will deploy the remaining 32
| |
| technologies, while documenting all results with global CAD and
| |
| instructionals support. Our goal is to secure a total of $5.5M for
| |
| 2012 by January 31, 2012. We are including $2.5M for prototyping,
| |
| $2.5M for documentation and field testing, and $1/2M for deploying
| |
| the fully-featured, open source CAD/CAM solution. See OSE Enterprise
| |
| Plan video.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>We
| |
| have grown from about $20k/year for the past 4 years to $500k in the
| |
| last 2 months, and we have the ambitious goal of $5M more secured
| |
| within one month. We pride ourselves in efficiency of resource
| |
| allocations. We spend about 98% of our resources directly on
| |
| prototypes built, and our overhead for the nonprofit sector donations
| |
| is 2% via a fiscal sponsor. We encourage you to donate and to put
| |
| your energy into this work. We are doing a lot of the development
| |
| with volunteers, and Factor e Farm is the main development facility.
| |
| We are also outsourcing as much of the design, prototyping, and
| |
| documentation work as possible – as funding allows. Increased
| |
| resources mean increased burn-down rate for the GVCS 50 technologies.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>The
| |
| next 14 tools are:</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"> </FONT>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <OL>
| |
| <LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>CNC
| |
| Multimachine </I>– we are currently considering Dan Granett, a
| |
| precision machining expert – to build out the CNC Multimachine,
| |
| while utilizing any relevant techniques from a collaborating group -
| |
| the Open Source Multimchine project </FONT></FONT></FONT>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>CNC
| |
| Circuit Mill </I>– Yoonseo Kang is the project lead on this at
| |
| Factor e Farm, and we are considering the <A HREF="http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/SnapLock">SnapLock
| |
| CNC</A> as our platform of choice, evaluating it at present before
| |
| starting deployment in January. Proposal Brief is forthcoming.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>Ironworker
| |
| Machine – Brianna Kufa is project lead, with initial design work
| |
| completed, and Proposal Brief forthcoming. We currently have a
| |
| <A HREF="http://blog.opensourceecology.org/2011/12/ironworker-shear-assembly-challenge-live-at-grabcad/">design
| |
| challenge up on GrabCAD</A> to develop an open source cutting blade
| |
| design.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>CNC
| |
| Torch Table – prototype I has been tested in producing tractor
| |
| parts with success, and optimization is needed for the software
| |
| tool-chain. We are currently considering an upgraded gantry shown
| |
| under <A HREF="http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/CNC_Torch_Table">Prototype
| |
| II on the wiki</A>, a simple DIY design which has seen many hundreds
| |
| of hours of production time and is a stable design. Z height control
| |
| needs to be developed.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>Induction
| |
| Furnace</I> – <A HREF="http://blog.opensourceecology.org/2010/02/open-source-induction-furnace-continued/">conceptual
| |
| design</A> done. Considering recruiting consulting assistance from
| |
| <A HREF="http://www.superior-power-components.com/">Superior
| |
| Induction</A>. Looking for subject matter experts to join this
| |
| project, Dedicated Project Visit or remote collaboration.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>Sawmill</I>
| |
| – Prototype I 75% complete, ready for motor and blade attachment;
| |
| looking for Dedicated Project Visitor for field testing.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>Backhoe</I>
| |
| – <A HREF="http://www.enniss.net/">Enniss Inc.</A> is being
| |
| considered for prototyping. </FONT></FONT></FONT>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>Bulllldozer</I>
| |
| – considering modified LifeTrac frame and weights, jack shaft
| |
| wheel drive and steel wheels like in old agricultural traction
| |
| engines from 100 years ago; 10,000 lb weight for first prototype.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>Well-drilling
| |
| rig </I>– considering design consulting from Enniss, Inc. Looking
| |
| for subject matter experts.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>Modern
| |
| Steam Engine </I>– current plan is to use the <A HREF="http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Modern_Steam_Engine_Build">Wally
| |
| Munster</A> scalable modern design. Collaboration with Tom Kimmel of
| |
| Steam Auto Club of America to develop a plant for the next
| |
| generation of modern steam Power Cubes, about 4x3x3 feet in size for
| |
| s 25 hp Prototype 1. Plant includes Gasifier Burner, Heat Exchanger,
| |
| oil pump, water pump. Plan for Heat Exchanger is to work with Tom
| |
| using his open source coil winder.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>Pelletizer</I>
| |
| – Need design and fabrication drawings. Can be fabricated by
| |
| Sweiger Shop readily. See pelletizer dies on <A HREF="http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Pelletizer/Research_Development">research
| |
| and development page</A> - and design around those.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>Power
| |
| Inverter </I>– following the development of the CNC circuit mill,
| |
| we will prototype the inverter. Need power electronics subject
| |
| matter experts to join the team.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <LI><P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><I>Solar
| |
| Concentrator </I>– the current plan is to build on documentation
| |
| available from the <A HREF="http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Solarfire">SolarFire
| |
| project</A>. Collaborating with <A HREF="http://www.calpoly.edu/~phys/faculty_pages/pschwartz.html">Dr.
| |
| Peter Schwartz</A> of Cal Poly on design evaluation.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| </OL>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><B>So,
| |
| You Want to Build a New Civilization?</B></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>All
| |
| right. Please go to the OSE Wiki and sign in. You will see a list of
| |
| the <A HREF="http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/GVCS">50 GVCS
| |
| technologies</A>, There is plenty of work left on the GVCS 50. Pick
| |
| one, and start contributing information. There is research and
| |
| development, where you can contribute conceptual design, analysis of
| |
| industry standards, diagrams, prior art, background research, and
| |
| other supporting information. Then comes the design stage – CAD,
| |
| calculations, simulations, fabrication drawings, etc.. Peer review is
| |
| useful. Then comes the build – which requires a bill of materials.,
| |
| sourcing, and a facility to build. We encourage you to work remotely
| |
| and contribute test data. We invite you to write a <A HREF="http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Proposal_Template">Proposal
| |
| Brief</A>, and we can fund your work upon technical merit. Or you can
| |
| come for a <A HREF="http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Dedicated_Project_Visits">Dedicated
| |
| Project Visit</A> to Factor e Farm.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>Is
| |
| a technology of your choice not part of the official 50 GVCS list?
| |
| Then start new pages on the wiki for non-GVCS tools. The wiki is
| |
| infinitely expandable. The GVCS is only a limited but sufficient set
| |
| – limited so it remains a tractable project with a clear
| |
| deliverable. We don't really know if the choices made are the best –
| |
| but we will reevaluate after the set is done by year-end 2012. We
| |
| can't tell until we see all the devices work together as a complete
| |
| set. We just selected the 50 best ones according to <A HREF="http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/OSE_Specifications">OSE
| |
| Specifications</A> and the <A HREF="http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Product_Selection_Metric">Product
| |
| Selection Metric</A> almost 4 years ago.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>If
| |
| you are a subject matter expert, designer, video editor, CAD
| |
| draftsman, or other technical contributor in any of the 50
| |
| technologies – you are welcome to bid on work. We suggest you
| |
| submit a Proposal Brief. The key to the project is fining qualified
| |
| people – and we found that word of mouth and references from
| |
| trusted sources tend to provide best results. Help us find these
| |
| people.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>We
| |
| are also looking for full time people to join Factor e Farm –
| |
| master builder, farmer, fabrication manager, CEO, CTO, and
| |
| co-founder. With the farmer and builder, we need to continue field
| |
| testing the equipment while feeding our team, building out
| |
| infrastructure, building out our electrical grid, and making other
| |
| tools. We are looking for startup instigators, not employees – as
| |
| this type of risk-sharing is part of the responsibility that we seek
| |
| in our partners. </FONT></FONT></FONT>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>There
| |
| are other support roles. We also welcome you to join us in resource
| |
| development – the OSE Enterprise is an open business plan that you
| |
| can use. We are working on developing remote video editing capacity,
| |
| where you can edit remotely after downloading footage from our
| |
| repository – such as YouTube. We are looking for ongoing CAD,
| |
| fabrication drawing, simulation, and analysis support for
| |
| prototyping.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>Regarding
| |
| other branches, regional groups, or chapters, you are welcome to
| |
| start them. If you want to use the name of Open Source Ecology –
| |
| you will be expected to produce open source designs, blueprints, and
| |
| open enterprise models – as in our core mission. To do so, you will
| |
| be required to sign a Charter as an official OSE facility. We will be
| |
| developing these standards this year as we evolve into a truly global
| |
| movement, and we will start OSE International as an umbrella
| |
| organization. We will be expanding to all goods and services, but for
| |
| now, we are focusing on the GVCS 50 as the strategic core. Once
| |
| developed, this will provide the track record, process, and economic
| |
| power to diversify into other products and to facilitate the creation
| |
| of communities, enterprises, and countries. Remember that this is an
| |
| Apollo Program for the GVCS – and we expect to finish the 50 beta
| |
| product releases by December 21, 2012. If things continue as they are
| |
| now, we may be done ahead of schedule. This will place us with a much
| |
| larger index of possibilities for 2013.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3>We
| |
| would like to continue making this one of the most collaborative
| |
| projects in the world: open engineering and open economic development
| |
| for the common good. </FONT></FONT></FONT>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal">
| |
| <BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><B>Appendix</B></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><BR> | | <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><BR> |
| </P> | | </P> |
| | </BODY> |
| | </HTML> |
| | <HTML> |
| | <HEAD> |
| | <META HTTP-EQUIV="CONTENT-TYPE" CONTENT="text/html; charset=utf-8"> |
| | <TITLE></TITLE> |
| | <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="LibreOffice 3.3 (Unix)"> |
| | <META NAME="AUTHOR" CONTENT="Marcin "> |
| | <META NAME="CREATED" CONTENT="20111226;2063200"> |
| | <META NAME="CHANGEDBY" CONTENT="Marcin "> |
| | <META NAME="CHANGED" CONTENT="20111226;2064500"> |
| | <STYLE TYPE="text/css"> |
| | <!-- |
| | @page { margin: 0.79in } |
| | P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } |
| | A:link { so-language: zxx } |
| | --> |
| | </STYLE> |
| | </HEAD> |
| | <BODY LANG="en-US" DIR="LTR"> |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000"><B>Appendix – | | <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000"><B>Appendix – |
| Legacy Site for OSE</B></FONT></P> | | Legacy Site for OSE</B></FONT></P> |
Line 712: |
Line 479: |
| increasingly smaller percentage of the world's population is in this | | increasingly smaller percentage of the world's population is in this |
| position. </FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE> | | position. </FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE> |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal"><FONT COLOR="#222222"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman, serif"><FONT SIZE=3><B>Appendix</B></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000"><B>My Story </B></FONT>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000"><B>by Marcin
| |
| Jakubowski, 12.24.2011</B></FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">I have been asked
| |
| a number of times – what experiences led me to start OSE? I am
| |
| sharing my story here to shed some light on the formative experiences
| |
| influencing this work, with the hope that they may help to clarify
| |
| the approach.</FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">Ever since I was
| |
| a little child I wanted to apply science to creating human
| |
| prosperity. Wow – with all the Amazing technology around us –
| |
| life should be good. My father is a molecular biologist, and ushered
| |
| me to go high in academia. But the further I went the more useless I
| |
| felt, while noticing that there were pressing global ills to solve.
| |
| It was during my Ph.D. Program in Madison, WI, that I got
| |
| radicalized. I discovered first hand the myth of technology – with
| |
| ever improving technology, people are still working harder and
| |
| harder, missing out on the finer things in life. This troubled me
| |
| greatly.</FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">In Madison, there
| |
| was a string of events that led me to formulate the Open Source
| |
| Ecology concept. It actually started at Princeton U, where I went for
| |
| my undergraduate studies. I found Princeton to be a shocking wake-up
| |
| call – more a breeding place for the power structure of the world –
| |
| less a playground for ideologues improving the human condition. I
| |
| vowed after this never to go to another Ivy League, and found myself
| |
| at U. Wisconsin, Madison, for grad school - a progressive,
| |
| rabble-rousing environment. Soon enough, I became totally
| |
| disillusioned with my studies – I was becoming more specialized and
| |
| useless every day – and I was learning theory about things that
| |
| didn't exist. I felt that was a great abnegation of human
| |
| responsibility – given that there are pressing issues in the world
| |
| to solve. So I started getting involved in the student community to
| |
| remain sane. I started the Polish Club to bring the Polish crowds
| |
| together, then Global Connections, to get all the internationals
| |
| together. Then I moved on to organize interdepartmental grad student
| |
| socials – since we never had a chance to interact with anyone
| |
| outside of our department. Since I was interested in energy, I
| |
| started a Global Energy Forum, and then Sustainability Forum to
| |
| immerse intellectually in sustainability issues, then Gandhi Network
| |
| to get some hands-on experience beyond the mind, such as building a
| |
| solar dehydrator. Through all of these events, I learned 2 things.
| |
| First, people rarely collaborate or cross disciplines in their work.
| |
| Second – people did not have time to do cool things any more.
| |
| Lectures and workshops were all fun and games – but they were
| |
| really brief sessions of escapism - as nobody really had the time to
| |
| pursue any of the topics discussed any more deeply. People go to the
| |
| talks and workshops - then they go back to work for <I>the man</I> on
| |
| Monday. What was needed was a different lifestyle, a new economy –
| |
| where people were not so alienated from their work, where they could
| |
| pursue the things that they really cared about. It is then that I
| |
| thought that civilization needed a thorough reboot in terms of right
| |
| livelihood and meaning in peoples' lives. The economy and environment
| |
| and social justice were all in havoc all over the world – yet
| |
| everybody was going about business as usual.</FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">Then it became
| |
| crystal clear to me – only if we collaborate truly openly – as in
| |
| creating an open source economy where people actually build freely on
| |
| each other's progress – only then can we achieve a sound economy –
| |
| and ample spare time. This became clear to me when even I could not
| |
| discuss my PhD research openly with other university groups –
| |
| because we had hot stuff and competitive advantage for funding. Thus,
| |
| my learning process was hampered. That frustrated me to the point
| |
| that I decided I would work wholeheartedly to change this aspect of
| |
| modern civilization.</FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">In my last year
| |
| of the Ph.D. Program, I coined the Open Source Ecology concept. It
| |
| was about creating an open source economy – based on the principles
| |
| of collaboration that came from the open source software movement. I
| |
| claimed that if we operate openly, we learn more, we become more
| |
| responsible, which includes responsibility for taking care of nature
| |
| – as it is the source of all of our material well-being. Therefore,
| |
| open source ecology refers to the integration of human and natural
| |
| ecosystem into a harmonious system of interactions, based on open
| |
| source principles of cooperation.</FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">Any civilization
| |
| starts with access to land – so in my civilization reboot
| |
| experiment, land was the first thing I secured after my PhD. In the
| |
| initial phases, with little money and big dreams, voluntary
| |
| simplicity was my only option, and I explored the limits of how
| |
| little one could do with. But that got old after some time. I was
| |
| living like a hippie in the woods with a pocket knife, and it
| |
| occurred to me quickly that a firm economic foundation and powerful
| |
| tools were necessary if one is to face nature and ask her to provide
| |
| directly for one's needs. I also learned quickly that use of nature
| |
| does not have to mean abuse of nature.. I also learned that we have
| |
| the technology to do things right – in harmony with nature – and
| |
| it is only greed and myths that dictate that human prosperity should
| |
| be at odds with nature. I learned first hand from the land - that
| |
| nature is abundant – and that general human prosperity is a matter
| |
| of distribution – not production.</FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">So with this, my
| |
| tractor broke, and the rest is history as you see in my TED Talk of
| |
| 2011. Point is: we can create open source equivalents to industry
| |
| standards – AND take care of the environment, AND in fact, we can
| |
| do much better all together by eliminating the inefficiencies of
| |
| competitive waste in all its forms. Globalization is a simple
| |
| manifestation of competitive waste – competing for strategic
| |
| resources because we refuse to learn how to use local resources more
| |
| cunningly to achieve the same ends.</FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">I also come from
| |
| Poland, with its long history of war, surrounded by powerful
| |
| neighbors. My grandfather was in the Polish underground engaging
| |
| sabotage actions against Nazis during WWII, and he was a horseback
| |
| soldier in WWI. My grandmother was in a concentration camp. I read
| |
| all types of books on these troubling topics, as they are fascinating
| |
| – regarding the nature of the human spirit under extremes of
| |
| conditions – playing out the good old fight of good versus evil. I
| |
| pictured myself living in those times, and still have bad dreams from
| |
| time to time - and put myself in the place of the people in these
| |
| books - and consider how I would act myself. And today, I grasp to
| |
| understand why we are still so un-evolved as humans, still killing
| |
| one another. The most fascinating explanation I have yet read on the
| |
| topic – and interestingly – from a survivor of turbulent
| |
| political times of post-WWII Poland himself – is <I>Political
| |
| Ponerology: a Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political
| |
| Purposes</I>. That is the most important book on the topic of
| |
| achieving general human prosperity that I have read. It is a
| |
| psychological study that explains why psychopaths tend to move up in
| |
| corporate boardrooms and positions of power – and how all of us
| |
| support them - in getting there. </FONT>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">Today I do my
| |
| part in the open source 'underground' – a fringe movement still,
| |
| waiting to be the next trillion dollar industry. Except this time, it
| |
| will not be a centralist phenomenon – but a movement created by
| |
| many independent players. If we open source a few critical yet
| |
| sufficient technologies for survival as a species – then a shining
| |
| example can be set, and a solid economic foundation can be laid –
| |
| for human progress. My role is to seed a kernel, in the form of the
| |
| GVCS 50 tools – and the economic power created will take care of
| |
| the rest.</FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">What is the rest?
| |
| When people address basic material scarcity – a new economy, and
| |
| new politics, will follow. It will be a new paradigm. What do I see
| |
| myself doing then? I will be spending my full attention on how to
| |
| become a better human, and helping others to do the same. This
| |
| depends on material scarcity being removed as one of the stresses
| |
| affecting humanity, as mastering material security is a prerequisite
| |
| if we want to have a fair chance – of evolving to freedom.</FONT></P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">New education,
| |
| new communities, new politics – they are all around the corner.
| |
| Even when the world is cracking at the seams, the human spirit will
| |
| never die. </FONT>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><FONT COLOR="#000000">How are you doing
| |
| your part to play this out? </FONT>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR>
| |
| </P>
| |
| <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR> | | <P STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in"><BR> |
| </P> | | </P> |
| </BODY> | | </BODY> |
| </HTML> | | </HTML> |
| | {{Civilization_Starter_Kit_DVD}} |
| | [[Category:Foreword]] |
The
Open Source Ecology Paradigm
Marcin
Jakubowski, Ph.D., 12.24.2011
part
of the OSE Christmas Gift to the World of 2011
Introduction
The Open Source
Ecology Paradigm is an idea that the open source economy is a route
to human prosperity in harmony with natural life support systems.
Open Source Ecology (OSE) is a movement
to create the open source economy. The movement consists of hundreds
of entrepreneurs, producers, engineers, makers, and supporters around
the world – who believe in the power of open
– who share the open
ethic. The 'Ecology' in the name refers to the interaction of
natural and human ecosystems – the environmental, societal, and
technological systems – as they interact along open
principles. Read a further description of the OSE concept as it was
formulated initially in 2003 (see Appendix below). Since then, the concept
has evolved to a platform for creating distributive enterprise, as a
solid foundation for a sound economy - a third economic option beyond
capitalism or socialism. The distributive economy paradigm centers
around open access to efficient production as a means to transcend
artificial material scarcity. The paradigm uses open source tools and
techniques to produce advanced civilization – by unleashing the
power of the responsible
use of technology.
The main current
project of OSE is the Global Village Construction Set – a set of 50
Industrial Machines that allow for the creation of a small scale
civilization with modern comforts.
OSE
Mission
The
mission of Open Source Ecology is to create an open source economy -
an economy that optimizes both production and distribution, while
providing environmental regeneration and social justice.
Overview
of the OSE Paradigm
The
backbone of Open Source Ecology is open access to
economically-significant information – product designs, techniques,
and rapid learning materials for achieving this. Collaborative
development, 24/7 around the globe, leads to best practice designs -
accessible openly via the internet. When economic productivity is
unleashed as such, there is a direct effect on community prosperity.
As a result of lowered barriers to entry, each community can increase
the range of products and services that it can provide. Global
collaboration in open product and process design leads to best
practices being commonly available. This is opposed to the dominant
paradigm of today – where a few companies having the best products
or monopoly control, and by definition, the rest is mediocre. Open
economic development has the potential to raise the bar on the
quality of products in the productive economy – as opposed to the
enforcement of mediocrity through protectionism and monopoly.
All
wealth comes from nature – rocks, plants, sunlight, and water.
These are found ubiquitously. Yet the presence of strategic resources
results in conflicts over their appropriation. “Hey, that's my oil
under your land.” Open source technology can address this problem –
via principles of substitutability. There are many routes to
producing any economically significant product or service. Resilience
of communities depends on having a diversity of options. As open
access to technology becomes commonplace, every community can
increase its level of productivity and appropriate technology – to
the point that it can substitute any strategic material with local
options – without any reduction in the standard of living – while
contributing positively to global peace.
Transparency
of the connection between technology and nature means that people
begin to respect nature. This happens when people begin to respect
that their well-being comes from nature. This transparency is
facilitated when economically productive activities happen as close
to the community as possible – not out of sight, out of mind in
remote locations. This is true environmental accountability – as
one tends to not destroy their own environment. Thus, there is a
direct connection between transparency of production to natural
regeneration – as people begin to make more sound production
choices – by understanding the connection of production to the
land. This means that industry no longer needs to occur in the form
of toxic wastelands – but instead – eco-industry, on a human
scale – serving the needs of people, not centralized industries
competing for world domination.
Thus,
technology and technological literacy are a way to reconnect to
nature – not to destroy it.
The
above depends on increasing the density of knowhow and technology in
every community – which comes from the open paradigm – open
information, open communication, open everything. The limit of
optimal density of productive knowhow is the point that any community
is capable of producing the full range of essential resources
necessary for it to exist, grow, and prosper. This is not to say that
trade should not happen – but for community stability – trade
should be avoided on essential products that the community needs. As
much as a community would want otherwise – when placed in a
scarcity condition – rationality goes out the window and people
start to kill each other.
For
the first time in history – we have a chance to do otherwise.
Unleashed access to information and technology – as availed by the
computer age – means that any conflicts related to material
scarcity can become a thing of the past. This includes resource
conflicts, poverty, overpopulation, and even bureaucracy – as
bureaucracy is not much more than a mechanism to manage scarce
resources. Further, regulatory costs are minimized via technological
transparency - as a technologically-literate populace of the open
source age becomes increasingly responsible for its own actions.
This
is not a case for conflict between the rich and poor, the city or the
country, the first or third worlds – it is a case where open
access to information helps everyone. As barriers to entry are
lowered, social upheaval is minimized. As production remains high –
and increases due to the elimination of competitive waste –
prosperity can only increase.
This
is a paradigm shift. That is the core of Open Source Ecology.
This
does not address evolving as humans – in cultural and scientific
advancement - or in wisdom that prevents us from reverting to
insanity. Open Source Ecology only lays a starting point and
foundation - from which evolution becomes possible.
Open
We
support everything open.
See the notions of open
at the Shuttleworth Foundation -
http://www.shuttleworthfoundation.org/about-us/our-philosophy/communication/
Economy
and Ecology
Distributive
Enterprise - The distinguishing feature of this paradigm is a
focus on distributive enterprise – open publishing of not only
product designs, but also of open enterprise models so that others
can replicate best practices. There is a direct relationship between
open design and lowering of barriers to entry. Productive enterprise
forms the backbone for communities' infrastructures and their
prosperity. Open access to unprecedented high densities of productive
information means economic prosperity – and everybody wins.
The
open source economy is an economic system marked by open access to
best-practice designs and techniques for producing
economically-significant products and services. One feature of the
open source economy is Industry 2.0 – or distributed, flexible
production – where access to a down-loadable repository of open
source design feeds local, multipurpose digital fabrication
facilities. Such facilities - or powerful Microfactories - can
produce just about anything that a community will need - local food,
energy, housing, or cars. This is distinct from centralized
production facilities that exist today.
An
open source economy produces designs by global collaboration, with
development cycles 24/7 around the globe. When a sufficient number of
stakeholders join a development process, it is a matter of time
before the development cycle yields the best designs – and these
designs evolve continuously.
Integrated
Economy –
open
fosters rapid learning (open IP) and low capitalization (open source
products) – ie., lower barriers to entry. Lower barriers to entry
indicate that a single economic agent can have a broader range of
productivity, therefore more resilience from economic shocks. In the
limit of extreme diversity on the part of the producers, every
community can attain a complete economy. If product evolution
involves advanced techniques for material substitution, then every
community can attain a complete economy based
on local resources.
This is the solution to resource conflicts. This is stability in the
face of global economic upheaval.
The
end of artificial material scarcity –
Artificial material scarcity may be defined as the condition where –
in the absolute abundance of resources – namely rocks, plants,
water, and sunlight – the distribution to humans is drastically
uneven. Lowering barriers to entry helps to distribute production
more widely. Product optimization from open development includes
optimization for lifetime of use. Lifetime design (ie, lower
maintenance costs), combined with high productivity and low barriers
to entry - indicates that material abundance can be the general human
condition. This is a solution to poverty.
Transparency
of Resource Use and Feedback
– Rapid learning in the open source economy helps people gain
numeracy and technological literacy. Technological literacy promotes
the understanding of production – and specifically, the
relationship between natural resources and human population. Local
resource use fosters a high level of resource feedback loops – as
the state of the local environment is easily observable. Such
transparency of resource use is the solution to overpopulation in a
rational (materially abundant) society.
Lower
Cost –
by eliminating competitive waste, the cost of buying or making open
source products is reduced significantly.
Competitiveness
with Globalization
- When
IP access barriers are eliminated in the open source economy, cost of
production is reduced to production capitalization and labor. The
cost of production capitalization, under the assumption of flexible
fabrication assisted by automation - goes to zero in the scenario of
community-supported manufacturing (think Open Source Fab Lab in every
community). In the open economy of DIY ethics and local capacity and
transparency - the cost of labor goes down – as the user can also
learn to be the producer. In the limit of DIY ethic, this cost,
defined as cost of external labor - goes to zero – and is replaced
by one's time. Further, in the limit of lifetime-design products, the
time
required for production is minimized, as production has to happen
only once. Thus, competitiveness with globalization is achieved by
zero access barriers and local skill, and local social capital – a
different paradigm.
Ecology
Closing
the Nature-Technology Divide
– Truly sound technology is not at odds with nature. We have a
choice to produce technology in an environmentally sound way. For
just about every harmful and polluting industrial process, a clean
alternative may be found. Biomimicry shows us the way to do this in
many cases. Moreover, truly sound technology should bring us closer
to nature -
ie,
if we appreciate that nature provides all material wealth, we are
inclined to take care of nature. This is a case for educating
generalists – not technologists or environmentalists – people who
understand technology deeply to the point that they respect nature –
and people who understand the environment deeply to the point that
they they respect technology. Technological literacy is facilitated
by introduction of true technical education, as opposed to industry
standard marketing forces.
Product
Development Ecology
– In the mainstream, the designer is not the draftsman, the
draftsman is not the engineer, the engineer is not the fabricator,
the fabricator is not the user, and the user is not the repairman.
While it is touted as the pinnacle of specialization, this introduces
a lack of accountability between all these steps, and therefore,
inferior product design when considered from the human ergonomic
factors, product service, environmental issues, or wealth
distribution issues. Open source design addresses this, as it is
design by the people, for the people – and it is infinitely
customizable.
Environmental
Regeneration – There is a
direct link between open source technology and environmental
integrity. Open technology implies optimal technology – and one
part of optimization is optimization for environmental friendliness.
Thus, the trend of environmental degradation can be reversed to
regeneration.
Appendix –
Legacy Site for OSE
This is the
legacy site for Open Source Ecology from 2005.
Archived on
February 10, 2005, see Mission at
http://web.archive.org/web/20050210084651/http://sourceopen.org/
Our
Mission
by Marcin
Jakubowski,
11.30.03
I.
What is Open Source?
Open
Source refers to the model of providing goods and services which
includes the possibility of the end-user's participation in the
production of these goods and services. This concept has already been
demonstrated in Linux, the open source computing system. With Linux,
a large number of software developers have contributed to creating a
viable alternative to the proprietary Windows computer operating
system. Many people can readily see the advantages- all Linux
software is free. Please read these articles on the concept of Open
Source software and
its implications for changing
business.
II. What is
Open Source Economics?
Our
mission is to extend the Open Source model to the provision any goods
and services- Open Source Economics. This means opening access to the
information and technology which enables a different economic system
to be realized, one based on the integration of natural
ecology, social ecology, and industrial ecology. This economic system
is based on open access- based on widely accessible information and
associated access to productive capital- distributed into the hands
of an increased number of people. Read about an inspiring
example of such an economic model being currently put into practice
with respect to manufacturing vehicles.
We believe that a
highly distributed, increasingly participatory model of production is
the core of a democratic society, where stability is established
naturally by the balance of human activity with sustainable
extraction of natural resources. This is the opposite of the current
mainstream of centralized economies, which have a structurally
built-in tendency towards of overproduction.
III. What is
Open Source Ecology?
We derive our
organization's name from a concept which refers to the integration of
the natural, societal, and industrial ecologies- Open Source Ecology-
aiming at sustainable and regenerative economics. We are convinced
that a possibility of a quality life exists, where human needs are
guaranteed to the world's entire population- as long as we ask
ourselves basic questions on what societal structures and productive
activities are truly appropriate to meeting human needs for all. At
the end of the day, the goal is to liberate our time to engage in
exactly that which each of us wants to be doing- instead of what we
need to do to survive. All have the potential to thrive. Today, an
increasingly smaller percentage of the world's population is in this
position.
Back to Table of Contents