Template talk:List of categories: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I am hoping that all this re-organization of the wiki categories will lead to a new site map. I find the site map to very valuable in navigating around and I'd like to see it handle categories at least three levels deep. We could put the whole category structure up there, but that might be TMI (too much information). Great work, BTW. I'm loving it! --[[User:Mjn]] 11:41, 4 May 2011 (EDT) | I am hoping that all this re-organization of the wiki categories will lead to a new site map. I find the site map to very valuable in navigating around and I'd like to see it handle categories at least three levels deep. We could put the whole category structure up there, but that might be TMI (too much information). Great work, BTW. I'm loving it! --[[User:Mjn]] 11:41, 4 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
== Distinguishing project pages from tool/technology pages == | |||
Can't post in the web infrastructure forum, so I'll post here. I think all specific project pages should belong to the category "Project". Other pages that are not explicitly project pages shouldn't discuss the projects, only refer to them. For example, the entry "Tractor" should discuss tractors in general terms and perhaps specifically what OSE needs tractors to do. However, specific implementations of tractors such as "Lifetrac", "Microtrac", or any other tractor projects in the future should be distinct. These specific projects fulfill the needs and available technologies specified in "Tractor". | |||
Revision as of 16:59, 17 June 2011
category tree
please read this: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:CategoryTree
i think we need to be using this more around the site. your thoughts? :) --syk0saje 08:25, 4 May 2011 (PDT)
Site Map
I am hoping that all this re-organization of the wiki categories will lead to a new site map. I find the site map to very valuable in navigating around and I'd like to see it handle categories at least three levels deep. We could put the whole category structure up there, but that might be TMI (too much information). Great work, BTW. I'm loving it! --User:Mjn 11:41, 4 May 2011 (EDT)
Distinguishing project pages from tool/technology pages
Can't post in the web infrastructure forum, so I'll post here. I think all specific project pages should belong to the category "Project". Other pages that are not explicitly project pages shouldn't discuss the projects, only refer to them. For example, the entry "Tractor" should discuss tractors in general terms and perhaps specifically what OSE needs tractors to do. However, specific implementations of tractors such as "Lifetrac", "Microtrac", or any other tractor projects in the future should be distinct. These specific projects fulfill the needs and available technologies specified in "Tractor".