Poured Concrete versus Bricks as a Building Material: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Minor Clarification)
(Minor Text Formating Fix)
Line 17: Line 17:
*[[Aerated Concrete]]
*[[Aerated Concrete]]


==Autoclaved Aerated Concrete==
===Autoclaved Aerated Concrete===
*[[Autoclaved Aerated Concrete]]
*[[Autoclaved Aerated Concrete]]



Revision as of 02:08, 21 May 2019

Basics

  • For A Wall that isn't CEB or Wood, the main remaining options are Blocks/Bricks and Poured Concrete
  • Concrete and Bricks are also the Main Options for Basements+Foundations
  • This page attempts to settle the debate via compiling research and expert opinoins
  • The main data will be strengths (Compressive, Tensile, etc), and Water Permiablity (IE will your basement flood more easily with one or the other?)
  • Another bit of study may need to be done on steel reinforcement in both, as well as a study of adjoining methods for bricks/blocks

Basic Summaries of Materials

Bricks/Blocks

Fired Clay

Cinder

Aerated Concrete

Autoclaved Aerated Concrete

Concrete

Autoclaved Concrete

Compressed Concrete

Compressed + Autoclaved Concrete

Poured Concrete

Poured Standard Grade Concrete

Note on other concrete mixes

Roller Compacted Concrete

Data

Compressive Strength

Tensile Strength

Water Permiability

Cost

Material Input Availibility

SME Testimony/Opinion/Experiences

Analysis of Data

Possible Future Studies

  • Longevity

Future Applications of This Study

  • High Strength Buildings (Hurricane/Tornado/Earthquake Proof Buildings)
  • Dams

See Also

Useful Link