EV vs Hydrogen: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*EVs are a no go on first principles. I wonder when the world will stop deluding itself on this one. It will prosper in fringe markets such as forklifts, but no it cannot be a mainstream option because there is simply not enough lithium, and lithium mining is an environmental disaster. | *EVs are a no go on first principles. I wonder when the world will stop deluding itself on this one. It will prosper in fringe markets such as forklifts, but no it cannot be a mainstream option because there is simply not enough lithium, and lithium mining is an environmental disaster. | ||
*OSE is [[Solving Housing]] in 2021. In 2023, we are planning on [[Solving Energy]]. That means hydrogen as the next fuel of choice. | *OSE is [[Solving Housing]] in 2021. In 2023, we are planning on [[Solving Energy]]. That means hydrogen as the next fuel of choice. | ||
=Popular View Against Hydrogen= | |||
*Batteries are overall 80% efficient [https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesmorris/2020/07/04/why-hydrogen-will-never-be-the-future-of-electric-cars/?sh=f9aa4612fadd] | |||
*Hydrogen is overall 40% efficient. | |||
*Facts: these figures are | |||
Revision as of 18:14, 6 February 2021
OSE Assessment
- Lithium is a scarce and strategic resource
- Water is abundant
- EVs are a no go on first principles. I wonder when the world will stop deluding itself on this one. It will prosper in fringe markets such as forklifts, but no it cannot be a mainstream option because there is simply not enough lithium, and lithium mining is an environmental disaster.
- OSE is Solving Housing in 2021. In 2023, we are planning on Solving Energy. That means hydrogen as the next fuel of choice.
Popular View Against Hydrogen
- Batteries are overall 80% efficient [3]
- Hydrogen is overall 40% efficient.
- Facts: these figures are