Template talk:List of categories: Difference between revisions
(→category tree: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
i think we need to be using this more around the site. your thoughts? :) --[[User:Syk0 saje|syk0saje]] 08:25, 4 May 2011 (PDT) | i think we need to be using this more around the site. your thoughts? :) --[[User:Syk0 saje|syk0saje]] 08:25, 4 May 2011 (PDT) | ||
== Site Map == | |||
I am hoping that all this re-organization of the wiki categories will lead to a new site map. I find the site map to very valuable in navigating around and I'd like to see it handle categories at least three levels deep. We could put the whole category structure up there, but that might be TMI (too much information). Great work, BTW. I'm loving it! --[[User:Mjn]] 11:41, 4 May 2011 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:41, 4 May 2011
i suggest changing the following:
into this:
is that ok? --syk0saje 08:12, 4 May 2011 (PDT)
Categories for Related Groups and Collaboration
Current layout:
Proposed:
- Category:Related
- Category:Organizations (merge Category:Friendly Organizations and Category:Related Groups here)
- Merge Allied Organizations and Friendly Organizations; then, create pages for their items.
- Category:Resilient Communities
- Category:Related Wikis (Maybe rename to Wikis)
- Category:Collaboration Discussions (Keep this a sub-category of Category:Related ?
- Category:Organizations (merge Category:Friendly Organizations and Category:Related Groups here)
^ above content previously from Wiki maintenance --syk0saje 01:01, 4 May 2011 (PDT)
category tree
please read this: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:CategoryTree
i think we need to be using this more around the site. your thoughts? :) --syk0saje 08:25, 4 May 2011 (PDT)
Site Map
I am hoping that all this re-organization of the wiki categories will lead to a new site map. I find the site map to very valuable in navigating around and I'd like to see it handle categories at least three levels deep. We could put the whole category structure up there, but that might be TMI (too much information). Great work, BTW. I'm loving it! --User:Mjn 11:41, 4 May 2011 (EDT)