Laminated Ferrocement: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
LFC
LFC
'''
LFC Tests on panels''' - 6-13-2011 by Abe Connally, http:www.velacreations.com


'''Panel 1''' - 1 layer 3/8" hardware cloth, 36.5" X 20.75" - 757 si, 5.26 sf
5/16" - 3/8" thick
Cured for 3 days
17lbs, 3.23 lbs/sf
'''Panel 2''' - 2 layers 3/8" hardware cloth, 36.5" X 20.375" - 744 si, 5.17 sf
3/8" - 7/16" thick
Cured for 3 days
22lbs, 4.25 lbs/sf
'''
Tests''' - panels were placed on bricks, spaced 14" apart.  Weight was placed in center of panel, between brick supports.
Test 1 - 1 gallon water @ 8lbs on 2.25 si, 3.55 psi
Test 2 - 1 gallon water @ 8lbs on 1.5 si, 5.33 psi
Test 3 - human @ 173 lbs on 46 si, 3.76 psi
'''Results'''
Test 1, panel 1  - troweled side up - no visible sag or cracks
Test 1, panel 2  - troweled side up - no visible sag or cracks
Test 2, panel 1  - troweled side up - no visible sag or cracks
Test 2, panel 2  - troweled side up - no visible sag or cracks
Test 3, panel 1  - troweled side down - visible sag but no cracks
Test 3, panel 2  - troweled side down - slight visible sag but no cracks
Test 3, panel 1  - troweled side up - extreme sag and panel snapped along brick support
Test 3, panel 2  - troweled side up - visible sag but no cracks
Troweled side has 1/8" less concrete on mesh
'''Conclusions'''
Both panels survived psi ratings for tank design (3.44 psi), however because troweled side has less concrete, it is a weaker side of panel in compression.  Suggest using formed side as inside of tank, so that the troweled side will be in greater tension (more mesh, less concrete). 
Panel 2 with 2 layers of mesh seem to be stronger in all tests.
I think these would do just fine as roof tiles or panels, especially if shaped to take advantage of concrete's compression strength.  For a water tank, although they survived the psi required for an 8ft tall tank, I think more testing is required.
'''More Information'''
* [[:File:Ferrocement_panels_-_water_tank.pdf|LFC Panel Water Tank]]
* [[:File:Ferrocement_panels_-_water_tank.pdf|LFC Panel Water Tank]]
* [[:File:Ferrocement channels.pdf|LFC Channel Roof]]
* [[:File:Ferrocement channels.pdf|LFC Channel Roof]]


[[Category: Housing and construction]]
[[Category: Housing and construction]]

Revision as of 22:01, 13 June 2011

LFC LFC Tests on panels - 6-13-2011 by Abe Connally, http:www.velacreations.com

Panel 1 - 1 layer 3/8" hardware cloth, 36.5" X 20.75" - 757 si, 5.26 sf 5/16" - 3/8" thick Cured for 3 days 17lbs, 3.23 lbs/sf

Panel 2 - 2 layers 3/8" hardware cloth, 36.5" X 20.375" - 744 si, 5.17 sf 3/8" - 7/16" thick Cured for 3 days 22lbs, 4.25 lbs/sf Tests - panels were placed on bricks, spaced 14" apart. Weight was placed in center of panel, between brick supports.

Test 1 - 1 gallon water @ 8lbs on 2.25 si, 3.55 psi Test 2 - 1 gallon water @ 8lbs on 1.5 si, 5.33 psi Test 3 - human @ 173 lbs on 46 si, 3.76 psi

Results Test 1, panel 1 - troweled side up - no visible sag or cracks Test 1, panel 2 - troweled side up - no visible sag or cracks Test 2, panel 1 - troweled side up - no visible sag or cracks Test 2, panel 2 - troweled side up - no visible sag or cracks Test 3, panel 1 - troweled side down - visible sag but no cracks Test 3, panel 2 - troweled side down - slight visible sag but no cracks Test 3, panel 1 - troweled side up - extreme sag and panel snapped along brick support Test 3, panel 2 - troweled side up - visible sag but no cracks

Troweled side has 1/8" less concrete on mesh

Conclusions Both panels survived psi ratings for tank design (3.44 psi), however because troweled side has less concrete, it is a weaker side of panel in compression. Suggest using formed side as inside of tank, so that the troweled side will be in greater tension (more mesh, less concrete). Panel 2 with 2 layers of mesh seem to be stronger in all tests.

I think these would do just fine as roof tiles or panels, especially if shaped to take advantage of concrete's compression strength. For a water tank, although they survived the psi required for an 8ft tall tank, I think more testing is required.

More Information