OSE Forum Guidelines: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
**Non-open source content is allowed as a study of industry standards, but proprietary development per se is not allowed on the OSE Forums.
**Non-open source content is allowed as a study of industry standards, but proprietary development per se is not allowed on the OSE Forums.
*Moderators are vigilant on adherence to open source, collaborative development.
*Moderators are vigilant on adherence to open source, collaborative development.
*The OSE Forum will in time become an important resource for public-interest economic development. Moderators must keep this in mind to maintain accessibility to important knowledge, while maintaining privacy, and guarding the commons from enclosure. See [[OSE Data Retention Policy]]


=Open Source Franchises=
=Open Source Franchises=

Revision as of 16:06, 29 February 2020

Technical Development

  • Discussion must follow the OSE Vision
  • Each topic has a moderator to keep discussion on track, and to maintain the OSE Code of Conduct
  • Discussion must be relevant to carrying out the OSE Vision - and specifically - using Product Ecologies as defined in the Global Village Construction Set, adhering to the development of Distributive Enterprise, and focusing on Open Source, collaborative development
    • Translated to English: we develop Distributive Enterprise, using open source. Discussion must be based on that. If contributors are not aware of the meaning of Distributive Enterprise, moderators are encouraged to facilitate the clarity.
    • Development of products that do not use open licenses do not belong on the OSE Forum, and moderators are expected to keep threads focused mainly on open licenses
    • License clarity: any product development effort carried out on the OSE Forums must provide license clarity. Ie, it must be stated up front what open source license is being applied to a given product.
    • Non-open source content is allowed as a study of industry standards, but proprietary development per se is not allowed on the OSE Forums.
  • Moderators are vigilant on adherence to open source, collaborative development.
  • The OSE Forum will in time become an important resource for public-interest economic development. Moderators must keep this in mind to maintain accessibility to important knowledge, while maintaining privacy, and guarding the commons from enclosure. See OSE Data Retention Policy

Open Source Franchises

Community Discussion

  • Discussion at the highest level focuses on the transformation of civilization to post scarcity by addressing structural evil: those features of the operating system of civilization that do not promote happiness and self-determination.
  • Moderator keeps discussion relevant to the OSE Vision.

Links