Activated Carbon: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added some more links under the "External Links" section)
(Added some more links under the "External Links" section)
Line 54: Line 54:
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Activated_carbon Wikipedia Page on Activated Carbon]
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Activated_carbon Wikipedia Page on Activated Carbon]
*[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652617329554 A Paper on Using it for Desorbtion Refrigeration]
*[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652617329554 A Paper on Using it for Desorbtion Refrigeration]
*[
*[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ceat.200402000 A Paper on Fluidized vs Fixed Bed Activated Carbon VOC Scrubbers]


[[Category: Pollution Control]] ?
[[Category: Pollution Control]] ?

Revision as of 04:28, 22 June 2020

Basics

  • Any form of high purity elemental carbon processed to have high porosity
  • Used as a more efficient/dense chemical filter/reactor compared to standard carbon sources such as charcoal
  • Can be produced by high temperatures, medium temperatures and steam, or chemicals
  • Made with Calcium Chloride - [1]
  • Source material is usually charred wood (charcoal) or some form of coal (coke or raw coal)
  • We will be dealing with charcoal so most work is documented on Activated Charcoal

OSE Work

Re-Use/Recycling

  • The main issue is how it can absorb and be saturated pre use
    • Esentially meaning it is "regular" carbon/charcoal on arrival, and thus inefficient (bad in casual use, may mess up equipment, or cause more pollution in serious use)
  • Also eventually it will need to be swapped out and/or regenerated
  • Thus to close the Product Ecology we need to plot this out
  • Relevant Section of the Wikipedia Page

Disposal via Use in Other Applications

Reactivation

  • This is the preffered option, as it saves transport of new material in, although some methods may be heat/electricity intensive (commercial vs home needs etc need to be evaluated)
  • It can be device integrated, a seperate onsite device, or at a seperate dedicated facility

Device Integrated

  • The preffered option for medium scale (not home use, but not massive industry, thus most of ose?)
  • Thermal Reactivation Seems to be the Best Option?
  • Can be done with waste heat, or electric heat (induction even if a metal container is used)
  • Need to research temps needed, and gasses in/out
  • The optimal setup for this would be similar to PSA in that it would need to have at least 2 devices, for uninterupted use
  • Similar to a RTO as heat recovery may be reusable thus improving efficiency

Onsite Device

  • A Scaled down version of a dedicated facility's equipment
  • Most likely would be industrial furnaces/dryers etc

Seperate Dedicated Facility

    • Most likely would be large industrial furnaces/dryers etc

Internal Links

External Links