OSE Rover: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
*Up to 5-60 km [https://www.droneassemble.com/product/long-range-transmitter-60km-d03-telemetry-and-radio-two-in-one-for-uav-ground-station-pix-flight-controller-h840-p900-version/] | *Up to 5-60 km [https://www.droneassemble.com/product/long-range-transmitter-60km-d03-telemetry-and-radio-two-in-one-for-uav-ground-station-pix-flight-controller-h840-p900-version/] | ||
=Learning= | |||
*UDP vs TCP - [https://www.avast.com/c-tcp-vs-udp-difference#:~:text=TCP%20is%20best%20used%20for,is%20more%20important%20than%20reliability.] | |||
=Links= | =Links= | ||
Revision as of 23:22, 26 November 2023
About
This is OSE's implementation of Ardupilot Rover. Which board to run it on? Which operating system to work in? Which real time microkernel to use? What is the sensor compatibility?
Architecture
- Ardupilot vs Pixhawk - 2 software bases for drone control. Ardupilot is more versatile. [1] and has user-friendly mission planning. Ardupilot is GPL, vs BSD for Pixhawk. Ardupilot has Rover, Copter, and Plane. [2]
- You can run ardupilot on BBB - [3] using a cape to replace Ardupilot Mega capacity, but this cape seems no longer available. Dead end?
- Companion computers - can collaborate with a flight controller. [4]
- Beagle Bone Blue with Ardupilot - [5]
Prior Art
- Pixhawk + RPi is common - [6]
- Yuri Rage - rover lawnmower - [7]
- Good documentation on setup of RTK GPS base station for $300 [8]. That means you don't need a Virtual Reference Sation service for $2k/year subscription.
Transmitters
- Up to 5-60 km [9]
Learning
- UDP vs TCP - [10]