OSE Design for Fabrication: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In order to achieve [[Distributed Market Substitution]] of major industries on a 10 year or under time-scale, OSE designs for fabrication in a way that optimizes repliability using both [[COTS]] and | In order to achieve [[Distributed Market Substitution]] of major industries on a 10 year or under time-scale, OSE designs for fabrication in a way that optimizes repliability using both [[COTS]] and in-house fabricated components. This is part of our [[Social Production]] technology. | ||
In practice, this means: | In practice, this means: | ||
#'''Understand the production toolchain and workflow intimately.''' Design with careful consideration and understanding of the production tools, to optimize fabrication capacity to the design at the design stage. | |||
#Steel is favored on grounds of cost and strength over aluminum unless light weight is of greater importance | #Steel is favored on grounds of cost and strength over aluminum unless light weight is of greater importance | ||
#[[ZA Alloy]] is the material of choice for light-machinable parts | #[[ZA Alloy]] is the material of choice for light-machinable parts | ||
#Any design considers COTS part availability during the design phase, so that | #Any design considers [[COTS]] part availability during the design phase, so that COTS parts can be used interchangeably with in-house produced parts. This allows easy replication for those who cannot produce parts in-house. Further, it's a good idea to use COTS parts to avoid unnecessary machining. If it can be done with a COTS part, do it to favor access over point-performance at higher cost. When is it too expensive to build parts in house? Depends. | ||
#Design with open source parametric software so modifications can be made readily | #Design with open source parametric software so modifications can be made readily | ||
#Design for [[Product Ecosystems]] | |||
#Design using [[Module Based Design]] and [[Construction Set Approach]] | |||
#Design for swarm builds, so that builds can be achieved in rapid time |
Latest revision as of 17:46, 26 June 2020
In order to achieve Distributed Market Substitution of major industries on a 10 year or under time-scale, OSE designs for fabrication in a way that optimizes repliability using both COTS and in-house fabricated components. This is part of our Social Production technology.
In practice, this means:
- Understand the production toolchain and workflow intimately. Design with careful consideration and understanding of the production tools, to optimize fabrication capacity to the design at the design stage.
- Steel is favored on grounds of cost and strength over aluminum unless light weight is of greater importance
- ZA Alloy is the material of choice for light-machinable parts
- Any design considers COTS part availability during the design phase, so that COTS parts can be used interchangeably with in-house produced parts. This allows easy replication for those who cannot produce parts in-house. Further, it's a good idea to use COTS parts to avoid unnecessary machining. If it can be done with a COTS part, do it to favor access over point-performance at higher cost. When is it too expensive to build parts in house? Depends.
- Design with open source parametric software so modifications can be made readily
- Design for Product Ecosystems
- Design using Module Based Design and Construction Set Approach
- Design for swarm builds, so that builds can be achieved in rapid time