OSE Theory of Efficient Builds: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=It's all in the Prep= | =It's all in the Prep= | ||
Applied to housing - one can prepare for rapid [[Swarm Builds]] with jigs, modular design, preassembly of modules, [[Integrated Design]] of modules, and [[Design for Preassembly]]. An assumption of swarm builds is that such builds offer learning and a simplified build process - without reducing build performance. | Applied to housing - one can prepare for rapid [[Swarm Builds]] with jigs, modular design, preassembly of modules, [[Integrated Design]] of modules, and [[Design for Preassembly]]. An assumption of swarm builds is that such builds offer learning and a simplified build process - without reducing build performance. | ||
=[[Critical Theory]]= | |||
*Specialization drives cost up: instead of one person sufficing for a job, multiple people are involved. Coordination losses in house construction drives cost up, as opposed to using general skill builders. | |||
Revision as of 22:58, 7 August 2023
This is nothing new, just building on elimination of muda, 6 Sigma, Test-Driven Design, Second Toyota Paradox, Visual Workshop, and other techniques for rapid builds.
It's all in the Prep
Applied to housing - one can prepare for rapid Swarm Builds with jigs, modular design, preassembly of modules, Integrated Design of modules, and Design for Preassembly. An assumption of swarm builds is that such builds offer learning and a simplified build process - without reducing build performance.
Critical Theory
- Specialization drives cost up: instead of one person sufficing for a job, multiple people are involved. Coordination losses in house construction drives cost up, as opposed to using general skill builders.