Talk:Hydrothermal Carbonization: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added some thoughts of mine)
 
(Brought Everyone up to Speed on What i Just Did and Plan to Do)
 
Line 6: Line 6:


--[[User:Eric|Eric]] ([[User talk:Eric|talk]]) 01:27, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
--[[User:Eric|Eric]] ([[User talk:Eric|talk]]) 01:27, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
----
I revisited this, i removed some of the SPECIFICS and added a section mentioning how one can tune the process to make an oily lignite like “biocoal”, or produce a [[Petcoke]] / [[Carbon Black]] like “Hydrochar”
I’ll give that article a read too!
(Sidenote, sorry for messing up the aesthetics!  It may need to be adjusted a bit by whoever is good with the image coding and whatnot.  I think I’ll keep the SEM Image and remove the soil one?  I’ll do that but am 100% open to discussion on this / reverting to both images being on the page.  Just thinking in terms of readability (although this can be addressed by people who can code the images into better spots maybe))
--[[User:Eric|Eric]] ([[User talk:Eric|talk]]) 19:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:22, 16 September 2024

I'd need to read up on this, but given the Pyrolysis Oil / Bio-Tar content, i would imagine it would not be a good soil additive (essentially like watering your garden with Waste Motor Oil , but yeah.

The orignal edits may have been referring to some sort of process where only a Charcoal / Carbon Black Type Substance remains though, in which case they would be right.

I need to read up more on this, but i thought i'd point that out.

--Eric (talk) 01:27, 26 May 2023 (UTC)



I revisited this, i removed some of the SPECIFICS and added a section mentioning how one can tune the process to make an oily lignite like “biocoal”, or produce a Petcoke / Carbon Black like “Hydrochar”

I’ll give that article a read too!

(Sidenote, sorry for messing up the aesthetics! It may need to be adjusted a bit by whoever is good with the image coding and whatnot. I think I’ll keep the SEM Image and remove the soil one? I’ll do that but am 100% open to discussion on this / reverting to both images being on the page. Just thinking in terms of readability (although this can be addressed by people who can code the images into better spots maybe))

--Eric (talk) 19:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)