Comparison of Wood Chips vs Wood Pellets vs Small Sticks as Wood Fuel
From Open Source Ecology
Basics
- This page aims to examine different fuels that could be used in small fireplaces and stoves such as a TLUD or Bio-Lite Camp Stove etc
Wood Sticks
- Least Processing Required
- Can be gathered directly from the forest with no snapping, or simply with hands/boots
- Alternately can be made from fallen branches or Tree Pruning debris (ESPECIALLY from Willow and Crape Myrtle with a hand saw or Reciprocating Saw etc
- Can be stacked like Cordwood / Firewood
- Cannot be as easily moved around mechanically unlike Wood Chips and Wood Pellets
- A (potentially 3D Printed ) Wood Stick Fuel Cutting Jig may be very useful
- One would have a pile of sticks on one side, the jig on the table with your saw of choice, stack or full bucket/drum of uniform length fuel on the other side
Wood Chips
- While they do require processing with a dedicated machine, a Wood Chipper / Hamermill these tend to be somewhat simple compact and low to medium cost devices
- As with Wood Pellets , Wood Chips can be conveyed via Augers or Pneumatic Conveyors etc
- Also due to increased surface area they may dry faster (Citation/Research Needed)
- Main downside is needing the woodchipper, especially since most seem to be Gasoline Powered
- Electric Woodchippers are worth looking into bust especially non 220v ones seem rather anemic short of small feedstocks that may be better used as stick fuel
Wood Pellets
- Probably the best fuel type, but also requires the most processing
- While ‘’in theory’’ a Pellet Mill is all that is needed, best practice uses:
- Once made however due to the partial remelting of the Lignin and so on the are more water resistant, they are near exactly uniform, even moreso than wood chips
- They are a high value product (citation needed)
- Other Solid Fuels / Feedstocks can also be blended into the feedstock before the Powder Mill
Internal Links
External Links