OSE Podcast: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
=Basics=
=Basics=
*A [[Podcast]] on all things OSE + OSE Related
*A [[Podcast]] to assist OSE's goal of clarity towards [[GVCS]] completion by 2028 to the [[End State]]


=Concepts Over the Years=
=2020 Concept=
==2020 Concept==
*Towards open source economy, interviewing leading seminal players, and current entrepreneurs.
*Towards open source economy, interviewing leading seminal players, and current entrepreneurs.
*Movement entrepreneurship starts with unlimited learning and constant updating of mental models for personal and political performance.
*Movement entrepreneurship starts with unlimited learning and constant updating of mental models for personal and political performance.

Revision as of 16:44, 28 May 2020

Basics

2020 Concept

  • Towards open source economy, interviewing leading seminal players, and current entrepreneurs.
  • Movement entrepreneurship starts with unlimited learning and constant updating of mental models for personal and political performance.
  • For interviewees, "So tell me, teach me everything that you know about X in the next hour?" Note that the mark of a genius is an answer, "Sure." The ones that say "There's too much to share" are not yet at the top.

2017 Concept

See 2017 Podcast Concept

Design

  • Must be seminal thinkers or agents running publically-recognized and ahead-of-their-time content.
  • Must be inclusive - of all interests from left or right, red or green, black or white, whatever. We care about expanding conscsiousness and providing a balanced viewpoint slanted to supercooperation and the collaborative economy.

Key Players

  • Joshua Pearce, Catarina, and Alicia
  • Free Hardware interests
  • Free Hardware initial standards interests
  • Good projects - FreeCAD
  • Another level - Vinay

Program

  1. Martin Nowak - [1]. Possibly other authors of related books. Dr. Seems low on the humility scale, so this should be kept in mind - see review [2]. Extended critique of book in another review - [3]. Notes: from the critiques the importance of biased perspective comes to mind. At all times - what are the competing theories? What are both the strongpoints and shortcomings of the current proposition? What does a synthesis of contending viewpoints look like? This would qualify as OSE's 'inclusive' aspect in its Vision, which means we take the arguments from all sides.

Internal Links

External Links