Public Audit: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
OSE values transparency, which is part of the [[OSE Vision]]. It may be useful to include community feedback in the rating of [[OSE Chapters]]. Using the [[OSE Forum]], we can set up a section on feedback and rating. Such as: | OSE values transparency, which is part of the [[OSE Vision]]. It may be useful to include community feedback in the rating of [[OSE Chapters]]. Using the [[OSE Forum]], we can set up a section on feedback and rating. Such as: | ||
#Are chapters publishing all | #Are chapters publishing all materials under [[DIN SPEC 3105]]? | ||
#Are chapters working openly - as seen by a chapter log with effort, meetings published on YouTube, maintained [[Roadmap]], [[Critical Path]], [[Current Projects]]. | |||
#Are chapters making annual product releases moving the GVCS forward towards a higher [[State of Completion]]? | |||
#Are chapters doing effective programming, such as running workshops, builds, [[Extreme Manufacturing]], or [[Extreme Enterprise]] events? | |||
#Are the chapter's product reviews good? | |||
Latest revision as of 17:42, 3 July 2020
OSE values transparency, which is part of the OSE Vision. It may be useful to include community feedback in the rating of OSE Chapters. Using the OSE Forum, we can set up a section on feedback and rating. Such as:
- Are chapters publishing all materials under DIN SPEC 3105?
- Are chapters working openly - as seen by a chapter log with effort, meetings published on YouTube, maintained Roadmap, Critical Path, Current Projects.
- Are chapters making annual product releases moving the GVCS forward towards a higher State of Completion?
- Are chapters doing effective programming, such as running workshops, builds, Extreme Manufacturing, or Extreme Enterprise events?
- Are the chapter's product reviews good?