Battery Storage: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (Moved some stuff around) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*Available reserves of Lithium, and for that matter nickel in [[Nickel-Iron Batteries]] - are not sufficient to provide energy storage for transportation - with quick first-principle calculations considered. See [[World Lithium Reserves]] | *Available reserves of Lithium, and for that matter nickel in [[Nickel-Iron Batteries]] - are not sufficient to provide energy storage for transportation - with quick first-principle calculations considered. See [[World Lithium Reserves]] | ||
*OSE does not promote battery storage for the bulk of humanity's needs - but instead - [[Solar Hydrogen Storage]] | *OSE does not promote battery storage for the bulk of humanity's needs - but instead - [[Solar Hydrogen Storage]] | ||
*Batteries are still useful for many electric devices and power tools | *Batteries are still useful for many electric devices and power tools, such as the [[Electric Power Cube]] | ||
[[Category: Battery]] [[Category: Energy]] | |||
Latest revision as of 01:50, 24 April 2022
- 300TWhr of battery storage is necessary to transition to a renewable storage situation [1]
- Question is more important than the answer in the talk above.
- Future should not be about solving one problem after another. It should be something that gets you excited
OSE Notes
- Available reserves of Lithium, and for that matter nickel in Nickel-Iron Batteries - are not sufficient to provide energy storage for transportation - with quick first-principle calculations considered. See World Lithium Reserves
- OSE does not promote battery storage for the bulk of humanity's needs - but instead - Solar Hydrogen Storage
- Batteries are still useful for many electric devices and power tools, such as the Electric Power Cube