Single Fuel Concept: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added some more information)
(Minor Clarification)
 
Line 36: Line 36:
**Standard “Heavy Fuel” (for Diesel and Jet)
**Standard “Heavy Fuel” (for Diesel and Jet)
*Main onus of responsibility would be on Engine Design/Equipment Sourcing, not as much fuel design
*Main onus of responsibility would be on Engine Design/Equipment Sourcing, not as much fuel design
*A related concept would be “Upgrading” all solid fuels to an [[UCC]] Pellet or Briquette thus negating any differences in [[Calorific Value]] (and also negating issues of [[Moisture Content]] and [[Ash Content]] )


=Related Devices=
=Related Devices=

Latest revision as of 02:22, 12 January 2026

Basics

Related Devices

Lighters/Firemaking

Portable Stoves/Heaters

Small Generators

Large Generators

  • Think Caterpillar Backup Generators etc
  • Proven

Automotive Use

Aero-Engine Use

  • Jet Engines / Turboprops are obviously proven
  • Aerospace Diesel Engines offer an “easy out” of 100LL and may also integrate well with a Single Fuel Standard

Micropower

  • Fuel Reformer for (gas fed) Small Engines or SOFC stacks
  • Low Technology Readiness Level but VERY interesting future tech

Internal Links

External Links