Activated Carbon: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added some more links under the "External Links" section) |
(Added some more links under the "External Links" section) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
*Thus to close the [[Product Ecology]] we need to plot this out | *Thus to close the [[Product Ecology]] we need to plot this out | ||
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Activated_carbon#Reactivation_and_regeneration Relevant Section of the Wikipedia Page] | *[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Activated_carbon#Reactivation_and_regeneration Relevant Section of the Wikipedia Page] | ||
==Methods== | |||
*Thermal | |||
*Liquid Chemical Washing | |||
**[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rF69e159Ork A company that does this with water and ozone] | |||
==Disposal via Use in Other Applications== | ==Disposal via Use in Other Applications== | ||
Line 50: | Line 55: | ||
=Internal Links= | =Internal Links= | ||
*[[Activated Charcoal]] | *[[Activated Charcoal]] | ||
*[[Activated Carbon Production Workflow]] | |||
=External Links= | =External Links= | ||
Line 56: | Line 62: | ||
*[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ceat.200402000 A Paper on Fluidized vs Fixed Bed Activated Carbon VOC Scrubbers] | *[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ceat.200402000 A Paper on Fluidized vs Fixed Bed Activated Carbon VOC Scrubbers] | ||
*[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/004313549290132N A Paper on use of Fluidized Activated Carbon in a WWT Bioreactor] | *[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/004313549290132N A Paper on use of Fluidized Activated Carbon in a WWT Bioreactor] | ||
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNKeps6pIao The Youtube Channel "Cody's Lab" producing some small scale (in a fire kiln) ] | |||
[[Category: Pollution Control]] ? | [[Category: Materials]] [[Category: Pollution Control]] ? |
Latest revision as of 17:29, 15 July 2020
Basics
- Any form of high purity elemental carbon processed to have high porosity
- Used as a more efficient/dense chemical filter/reactor compared to standard carbon sources such as charcoal
- Can be produced by high temperatures, medium temperatures and steam, or chemicals
- Made with Calcium Chloride - [1]
- Source material is usually charred wood (charcoal) or some form of coal (coke or raw coal)
- We will be dealing with charcoal so most work is documented on Activated Charcoal
OSE Work
- Based of this and other research
- Use in Bioreactors , Anerobic Digesters , WWT , and PBRs as a high surface area additive for aiding sludge / biofilm development
- Use in chemical reactors, and in Fluidized Bed Reactors
- Can it replace Zeolite in applications where carbon is of no isse (granted out that may leave out most reactions...)
- On a side note Metal Sputtering etc may "seal" the carbon off effectively?
- Use as enhanced Biochar
Re-Use/Recycling
- The main issue is how it can absorb and be saturated pre use
- Esentially meaning it is "regular" carbon/charcoal on arrival, and thus inefficient (bad in casual use, may mess up equipment, or cause more pollution in serious use)
- Also eventually it will need to be swapped out and/or regenerated
- Thus to close the Product Ecology we need to plot this out
- Relevant Section of the Wikipedia Page
Methods
- Thermal
- Liquid Chemical Washing
Disposal via Use in Other Applications
- Can be used for Tera Preta / Biochar
- Can be used as a Biofuel (similar to Charcoal , Charcoal Pellets , or Charcoal Dust
- GRANTED this may require washing of absorbed pollutants etc?
Reactivation
- This is the preffered option, as it saves transport of new material in, although some methods may be heat/electricity intensive (commercial vs home needs etc need to be evaluated)
- It can be device integrated, a seperate onsite device, or at a seperate dedicated facility
Device Integrated
- The preffered option for medium scale (not home use, but not massive industry, thus most of ose?)
- Thermal Reactivation Seems to be the Best Option?
- Can be done with waste heat, or electric heat (induction even if a metal container is used)
- Need to research temps needed, and gasses in/out
- The optimal setup for this would be similar to PSA in that it would need to have at least 2 devices, for uninterupted use
- Similar to a RTO as heat recovery may be reusable thus improving efficiency
Onsite Device
- A Scaled down version of a dedicated facility's equipment
- Most likely would be industrial furnaces/dryers etc
Seperate Dedicated Facility
- Most likely would be large industrial furnaces/dryers etc