Distributed Quality Control: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
RootIaliel (talk | contribs) m (Fixed spelling, added space) |
(→Links) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Distributed Quality Control (DQC) of open source hardware refers to quality control performed not in centralized facilities, but by distributed microfactories. OSE is experimenting with this paradigm as a route to the open source economy of distributed manufacturing and [[Distributive Enterprise]]. The scale of production can be as small as home-scale production, or | Distributed Quality Control (DQC) of open source hardware refers to quality control performed not in centralized facilities, but by distributed microfactories. OSE is experimenting with this paradigm as a route to the open source economy of distributed manufacturing and [[Distributive Enterprise]]. The scale of production can be as small as home-scale production, or larger microfactories. Homes, schools, and small enterprises diversify into distributed manufacturing. For this, [[Truly Replicable Production]] is required. To achieve Truly Replicable Production - part of the game involves developing transparent mechanisms whereby quality control is certified by international standards bodies (UL, CE, ASME, etc) - or new entities can be created to support decentralized production (DeFab). | ||
Engaging in | Engaging in DQC involves producing documentation. The most effective, digital, practical documentation is a time lapse video showing test procedures for visual examination by a reviewer. | ||
=Transparency Protocol= | |||
*A governance mechanism for DeFab (analogue of DeSci, DeFi, ReFi, etc) is to be established. Initial draft: | |||
*Create Foundational Criteria | |||
**open design for a product- fully accessible, complete CAD data published in an open source format on an open access public repository | |||
**Certification organization - to manage open CAD data repositories and their standards | |||
**Open Source design for production machinery and data collection machinery | |||
**Open source design for production engineering | |||
**Open source design for data collection | |||
**Open source materials production machinery | |||
**Open repository of published performance, test, materials science, etc data. For unequivocal identification of performance standards and their deviation | |||
**Definitions of acceptable performance limits for [[2 Sigma]] to [[6 Sigma]] quality control levels | |||
**A funding mechanism taking a minute fraction of production proceeds to maintain repositories, standards for DeFab, and training for producers interested in joining the DeFab ecosystem. | |||
=Links= | |||
*[[Digitally Responsible]] | |||
*[[OSE Crypto]] | |||
*[[Cryptocurrency]] | |||
*[[Digital Responsibility]] | |||
*[[Limited Digitality]] | |||
*[[Remote Quality Control]] | |||
Latest revision as of 15:40, 17 September 2022
Distributed Quality Control (DQC) of open source hardware refers to quality control performed not in centralized facilities, but by distributed microfactories. OSE is experimenting with this paradigm as a route to the open source economy of distributed manufacturing and Distributive Enterprise. The scale of production can be as small as home-scale production, or larger microfactories. Homes, schools, and small enterprises diversify into distributed manufacturing. For this, Truly Replicable Production is required. To achieve Truly Replicable Production - part of the game involves developing transparent mechanisms whereby quality control is certified by international standards bodies (UL, CE, ASME, etc) - or new entities can be created to support decentralized production (DeFab).
Engaging in DQC involves producing documentation. The most effective, digital, practical documentation is a time lapse video showing test procedures for visual examination by a reviewer.
Transparency Protocol
- A governance mechanism for DeFab (analogue of DeSci, DeFi, ReFi, etc) is to be established. Initial draft:
- Create Foundational Criteria
- open design for a product- fully accessible, complete CAD data published in an open source format on an open access public repository
- Certification organization - to manage open CAD data repositories and their standards
- Open Source design for production machinery and data collection machinery
- Open source design for production engineering
- Open source design for data collection
- Open source materials production machinery
- Open repository of published performance, test, materials science, etc data. For unequivocal identification of performance standards and their deviation
- Definitions of acceptable performance limits for 2 Sigma to 6 Sigma quality control levels
- A funding mechanism taking a minute fraction of production proceeds to maintain repositories, standards for DeFab, and training for producers interested in joining the DeFab ecosystem.