OSE Podcast: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
=Program= | =Program= | ||
#Martin Nowak - [https://www.amazon.com/SuperCooperators-Altruism-Evolution-Other-Succeed/dp/1451626630]. Possibly other authors of related books. Dr. Seems low on the humility scale, so this should be kept in mind - see review [https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/R2SNCOV0IZKZXT/ref=cm_cr_getr_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=1451626630]. Extended critique of book in another review - [https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/R1UV4PCAOZQCL7/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=1451626630]. '''Notes:''' from the critiques the importance of biased perspective comes to mind. At all times - what are the competing theories? What are both the strongpoints and shortcomings of the current proposition? What does a synthesis of contending viewpoints look like? This would qualify as OSE's 'inclusive' aspect in its [[Vision]], which means we take the arguments from all sides. | #Martin Nowak - [https://www.amazon.com/SuperCooperators-Altruism-Evolution-Other-Succeed/dp/1451626630]. Possibly other authors of related books. Dr. Seems low on the humility scale, so this should be kept in mind - see review [https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/R2SNCOV0IZKZXT/ref=cm_cr_getr_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=1451626630]. Extended critique of book in another review - [https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/R1UV4PCAOZQCL7/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=1451626630]. '''Notes:''' from the critiques the importance of biased perspective comes to mind. At all times - what are the competing theories? What are both the strongpoints and shortcomings of the current proposition? What does a synthesis of contending viewpoints look like? This would qualify as OSE's 'inclusive' aspect in its [[Vision]], which means we take the arguments from all sides. | ||
==2017 Concept== | ==2017 Concept== | ||
See [[2017 Podcast Concept]] | See [[2017 Podcast Concept]] | ||
= | = Links= | ||
*[[Podcast]] | |||
*[[2017 Podcast Concept]] | |||
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podcast The Wikipedia Page on Podcasts] | *[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podcast The Wikipedia Page on Podcasts] | ||
[[Category:OSE Podcast]] | [[Category:OSE Podcast]] | ||
Revision as of 16:22, 2 June 2020
Introduction
A Podcast is useful to assist OSE's goal of clarity towards GVCS completion by 2028, and to the End State beyond.
Pocast Recommendation Form
Do you have somebody that you would like to recommend?
2020 Concept
- Towards open source economy, interviewing leading seminal players, and current entrepreneurs.
- Movement entrepreneurship starts with unlimited learning and constant updating of mental models for personal and political performance.
- For interviewees, "So tell me, teach me everything that you know about X in the next hour?" Note that the mark of a genius is an answer, "Sure." The ones that say "There's too much to share" are not yet at the top.
Design
- Must be seminal thinkers or agents running publically-recognized and ahead-of-their-time content.
- Must relate to collaborative design for a transparent and inclusive economy of abundance
- Approach must be inclusive - of all interests from left or right, red or green, black or white, whatever. We care about expanding conscsiousness and providing a balanced viewpoint slanted to supercooperation and the collaborative economy.
Key Players
- Joshua Pearce, Catarina, and Alicia
- Free Hardware interests
- Free Hardware initial standards interests
- Good projects - FreeCAD
- Another level - Vinay
Program
- Martin Nowak - [1]. Possibly other authors of related books. Dr. Seems low on the humility scale, so this should be kept in mind - see review [2]. Extended critique of book in another review - [3]. Notes: from the critiques the importance of biased perspective comes to mind. At all times - what are the competing theories? What are both the strongpoints and shortcomings of the current proposition? What does a synthesis of contending viewpoints look like? This would qualify as OSE's 'inclusive' aspect in its Vision, which means we take the arguments from all sides.