Public Audit: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
OSE values transparency, which is part of the [[OSE Vision]]. It may be useful to include community feedback in the rating of [[OSE Chapters]]. Using the [[OSE Forum]], we can set up a section on feedback and rating. Such as:
OSE values transparency, which is part of the [[OSE Vision]]. It may be useful to include community feedback in the rating of [[OSE Chapters]]. Using the [[OSE Forum]], we can set up a section on feedback and rating. Such as:
#Are chapters publishing all meterials under [[DIN SPEC 3105]]?
#Are chapters publishing all materials under [[DIN SPEC 3105]]?
#Are chapters working openly - as seen by a chapter log with effort, meetings published on YouTube, maintained [[Roadmap]], [[Critical Path]], [[Current Projects]].
#Are chapters working openly - as seen by a chapter log with effort, meetings published on YouTube, maintained [[Roadmap]], [[Critical Path]], [[Current Projects]].
#Are chapters making annual product releases moving the GVCS forward towards a higher [[State of Completion]]?
#

Revision as of 17:41, 3 July 2020

OSE values transparency, which is part of the OSE Vision. It may be useful to include community feedback in the rating of OSE Chapters. Using the OSE Forum, we can set up a section on feedback and rating. Such as:

  1. Are chapters publishing all materials under DIN SPEC 3105?
  2. Are chapters working openly - as seen by a chapter log with effort, meetings published on YouTube, maintained Roadmap, Critical Path, Current Projects.
  3. Are chapters making annual product releases moving the GVCS forward towards a higher State of Completion?