User talk:Syk0saje: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
--[[User:Elifarley|Elifarley]] 18:23, 1 May 2011 (PDT)
--[[User:Elifarley|Elifarley]] 18:23, 1 May 2011 (PDT)


==[[Great price on the rack]]==
==Template: Under construction==
It's unclear what this is about. Could you please move this to the page of whatever tool it is for. Thanks. --[[User:Conor|Conor]] 20:55, 1 May 2011 (PDT)
Thanks for improving this template. It looks great! --[[User:Conor|Conor]] 03:19, 6 May 2011 (PDT)


== Functional Block Diagrams ==
== Functional Block Diagrams ==

Revision as of 10:19, 6 May 2011

Thanks for the assist. I'm still learning the naming conventions of the wiki pages. - Mark


See this for a tip ;)

And thanks for your help! --Elifarley 18:57, 27 April 2011 (PDT)

Redirecting to a category

See my change on the concept page.

Template: Under construction

Very nice template, thanks! -> Template: Under construction --Elifarley 18:23, 1 May 2011 (PDT)

Template: Under construction

Thanks for improving this template. It looks great! --Conor 03:19, 6 May 2011 (PDT)

Functional Block Diagrams

Re: your comment to me. My thought was to have a page for each diagram set, which includes the flow diagram plus any notes (1 or more jpg files, depending how extensive the notes are). Using a page allows comments, discussion, links to design drawings, outside links, etc to be gathered in the same place as the diagrams. By their nature, FBDs are a hierarchy or tree structure. Using a category is not a good way to present that, since that is a flat listing. You need to be able to include links up and down the tree so people can follow it. A category page for FBD images and another one for the FBD pages is OK if that helps keep track of them, but not at the expense of losing the structure.

Introduction

This was started on a suggestion from Elifarley to create something that emulated P2P Foundation in a nutshell. I think the creation of the crash course page makes this effort irrelevant. Rather than trying to merge it with OSE, it is probably best to delete it. Marie.Byleen 21:00, 2 May 2011 (PDT)

Category: 1000_Squared

Why you preferred to remove the text at that page, instead of adding the delete tag ? It looked like a valid page. --Elifarley 03:35, 3 May 2011 (PDT)

Wiki wish list

You have added a redirect to Wiki maintenance, but then you added the delete tag. I think a redirect is usually better than deleting a page. Please see Wiki instructions#Deleting_Pages.

Shouldn't we remove the delete tag? --Elifarley 06:24, 3 May 2011 (PDT)

Combining categories

I agree about your suggestion to combine the Functional Block Diagram categories, since pages and media are given their own sections. At this point I think we have a reasonable organization for the topic. I would like to focus on making the diagrams now, and stop messing with the wiki layout until it is time to start linking the Systems Engineering task to the hardware design.

Please go ahead and delete the two empty categories.

Avoid adding {{delete}} tags to redirected pages

Please see this change: http://openfarmtech.org/w/index.php?title=Heliostats&action=historysubmit&diff=24525&oldid=16408

You have added a redirect to Heliostat and also the {{delete|no inward links}} tag. Can you please remove the delete tag for the Heliostats page and any other page that has both a redirect and a delete tag?

Also, I have updated the deletion criteria as suggested by Marcin.

Thanks,

--Elifarley 23:33, 4 May 2011 (PDT)