Global Problemsolving Method

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to: navigation, search

About

Global problemsolving revolves around 4 simple things to create The OSE Solution. The OSE solution does not come from OSE, it is just global obvious tasks. To get there, we plan to create a Campus for each identified area. Forums and other communication channels distill and contribute to identifying Pressing World Issues. These are simply listed so the work is cut out for us. The key difference between the OSE effort and others is that we aim for agency, not talk - based on universally-accepted principles of goodness, thus being less politicised or special-interest. To create democracy, we need to educate people, create instititions, and distribute character-based leadership. In such a model, people are called out for real work, not for their political agendas of domination. This can lead to agency, purpose, prosperity.

The budget for solving any real issue should be on the billion scale. In the OSE Framework, that is the Core Enterprise Model and the million dollar scale, augmented to the $10M scale at the Campus level small-to-medium enterprise of nominally 10 cohorts of the core enterprise. Once a stable facility grows to 240, the operation can be the substance of a small city, on the scale of 2400, which gets us to the $0.1B scale. According to Farm Yields Per Acre, Solar Concrete and Solar Steel get us to the $1M/acre scale, such that a square mile could sustain a $1B/year operation. Such an operation is at the medium technology level, which does not enter yet upon semiconductor-based information technology, thus making this fairly straightforward to execute. In summary, one square mile core at $1B revenue. Compare to DeKalb County, MO, total earnings of $100M, 400 square miles, population of 10k [1]. With about 2% property tax rate, county budget is $2M? About right, documents say $3M [2]. In this case, the OSE value add would be 4000x (1 square mile, similar population, 10x revenue from that mile).

Other Notes

  • Expertise - Twitter
  • Forum - builds from Community Member, to Developer, Leader, Master, open source Ecologist, and on to ? Community. Even community requires commit to values and background reading, perhaps a quiz. - must perform to stay. Must get a score, if not- gets ousted. Contributor. Buy in literally, get a sticker (auto fulfill).Etc for swag. Contributors are cash, knowhow, design. Across all sectors. Must publish openly, no attribution required. No attribution allows for true giving? Explore this. Developer - wiki access, passes the wiki test. We set higher standards here for global Collab, settings ng bar higher for unpaid work. Leader - takes on leadership within mission of Solving pressing World Issues. Master, Extreme, Integrator etc - learned Art of Possibility. Interdisciplinarian. One who has learned Collaborative Literacy and can apply it to Swarm Builds. Open Source Ecologist - movement entrepreneur capable of starting new countries or Network States. Can design, build, calculate, operate at the Production Levels below.
  • Funding - large scalable biz such as SEH
  • OSE campus seed after Wiki selection process. Follows Network State concept.
  • People are educated to Worldsaver as the norm job, getting the world rid of evil.
  • Production Levels Required - a movement entrepreneur runs parallel branches under OSE certification for collaboration and openness according to the principles of Distributed Market Substitution. Runs at least 1000 acres of production to solve pressing world issues (wields 10% energy or 50 MW solar input (50,000 kg steel per hour). 50 ton per hour or 5000 ton in 100 hours (16 days). Only need about 1000 tons (20 tanks, 50 TEU containers) or 20 hr of production, so that over a weekend we can prepare remedies for war as needed. Need continuous bulk casting - not die-based but poured into bulk forms.

Discussion

From Elder Peterson - This recent article suggests that people whose homes burned in wildfires are rebuilding with compressed earth brick. They might be a new market, either as a resource to contractors or to DIY builders. [3]

Response: We are just getting started and the future brings in hybrid CEB-stick using non-cured block to allow for speed of Seed Eco-Home, much higher strength than stick, and fiberglass batts in the framing, u-trusses of OSB such as in the Universal Construction Set, and likely drywall due to its finish quality. Exterior could be vinyl or any standard material. PV is standard, with flat living roof. All innovative as industry standards would cost several times more. Then add heat storage with water in totes for full off grid with ample PV. Then we solve energy, with a hydrogen filling station in every home, at the cost of extra PV. How wonderful is that?.

TLDR: definitely CEB-stick hybrids, where stick gets you the alignment, and CEB gets you structure. with redundancy so either stick or brick alone is structural code compliant. It gets better by the minute, hence the need for open innovation.

Apprenticeship announcement soon. Please repost on FB Workshops if you like, linking to your nice article.

There is definitely going to be a market for eco CEB bug-out huts. Everyone is too scared.

More Notes: Dear Marcin,

I haven't followed this recently and only stumbled over the article I forwarded. I don't know anything new about Jim Hallock.

Where I am living now, in South Africa, many structures are built of brick or cinder block, then completely covered with stucco, and frequently repainted. On the outskirts of town are villages or neighborhoods called townships. Many structures are primitive, built of galvanized roofing panels and wood. It is challenging to see how these people might afford any significant improvement to their housing. They pay in advance for electricity which is added to their meter. Often, they run out of power to operate an electric stove or lightbulb. We try to call them on a phone, but they have "run out" of minutes, which they purchase in advance. When we suggest they download information, the storage available on their phone is insufficient. They do not have internet. Kitchen sinks drain outside on the ground.

Unemployment for 18-25 approaches 60%. People are sweeping gutters and sidewalks. Teams use string trimmers to clear grasslands. Individuals sort through trash to separate various bottles and types of plastic which they carry in huge bundles and sell to recycle.

In contrast, we see miles of fertile vineyards, olive and apricot orchards, and other agricultural fields. Food is plentiful and reasonably priced in malls and large, modern, grocery chain stores. BMW, and Mercedes as well as late model VW, Nisson & Honda are on modern, local highways.

Without commenting on personalities or issues, it is unconscionable that $1 bn will be spent in media, print, and TV advertising.

There are so many opportunities. Thank you for pursuing them.

All the best,

Elder Peterson

MJ response: Thank you for noticing the local conditions. I went to South Africa in 1995 for a 3 month internship at Eskom. I spent my first night in Soweto, with my coworker. The real deal is a Global Problemsolving Method which we are working on, so we can deploy on missions once we have ample staff. The big question is that which i noticed when I arrived to America fresh off the boat from Poland, in 1982. Why are certain countries well off, and others shit? The answer is Institutions. The 2024 Nobel Prize in Econ was awarded for coming up with this answer. So I am wondering if you also thought about this in similar lines. Because the problem is bigger and more costly than going on standard missions. It needs to call out for a much bigger solution, in terms of defining problemsolving on the institutional scale. You can contribute to the wiki etc by starting to define such propositions, including simple steps to get there. Such as: "The locals live in shit housing. The solution is econ dev. Here is a start. But this start builds to insititutions being created." Etc. That is the style with which we approach our Apprenticeship. We cross subsidize via robust enterprise. We replicate like mad. We build to sizeable cohorts based on 24 person class size. By 4 years, 240 people are working on 1 project. Campuses are built up to the 2400 person scale (may be too large for Maysville, we'll see - but definitely 240 people here). Then we need 100k of these serving 100k population each, worldwide, to span the entire population. In 2 decades we should have a new world.

Gpm.png

Links