Slide 31: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
----
----


Our program is different. All in all, we have a 3 step program for building and applying the Global Village Construction Set. First, we build the GVCS – we’re in the beginning of year 2 of 3 on this program. The second step is applying our tools in the local community – such that if we don’t see visible changes, we’ve failed, period. This stuff must be applicable right in our backyards first. The 3rd step is replication. As we gain experience in building one village and understanding all of the productive technology that goes into that endeavor, we become able to replicate. Each place that we build becomes a place of world heritage every inch of the soil improves with time – so that heaven on Earth is made. These places are not for sale. They are for the benefit of their stewards and communities. Replication – if successful in a large scale implies global economic transformation.
The bottom line in this program is local production. The entire economy rides on the back of physical production. If you are a computer worker or a paper shuffler – don’t forget that it is real, physical production that constitutes the substance of society.
 
Start producing. Start tinkering. Start becoming a producing member of your community. That’s the only way we can make a better world, and get the bad uglies out of running our lives.
 
We are asking you to absorb the type of philosophy embodied by the GVCS – that it is about tools with which communities can produce their own wealth from local resources – and keep that wealth in their borders. Once again, we’re not against global exchange – but just not in favor of complete dependence.
 
As another story – I must say what level of technology is appropriate. It is that which is common sense. If it doesn’t make sense, someone will try to use it to enslave you.  
 
We have been swindled out of practical skills and technical literacy by our education and media. We don’t know that we can be self-sufficient – only that the Corporation will provide for us.  
 
But the answers are beautiful and simple. CEB bricks. Solar energy. Permaculture. Permafacture. Let me assure you that the high level physics and science are rarely about making life better. I was searching for those solutions myself when I was back in school – going into Fusion thinking that it could be the next solution to the world’s energy crisis. I was totally oblivious that we can provide all energy amply from what already comes from the sun.
 
At one point it hit me, though. I was faced with a physics formula on a wave traveling in space that took up a good fraction of a page and frustrated with my lack of understanding of it- I asked the professor if he could just point to some physical situation or occurrence that would clarify what the formula meant. He answered, ‘There is none. I made it up.
 
You see, that’s the type of swindle that we’re up against. The high level science will not save us – it is more about making the obvious solutions accessible. That’s precisely the nature of the GVCS. It doesn’t require rocket science to get involved – just high school math and physics – and beyond that, it’s primarily organizational work of distilling the relevant information to what truly works. That’s what we’ve been doing nearly full time for about 5 years now, and I believe that the solutions we’re proposing simply work. If you can propose better solutions and if you can demonstrate that they have the potential of meeting OSE Specifications then we want to hear about them. We’re always open to better solutions.

Revision as of 19:35, 29 April 2008

Slide 1 - Slide 2 - Slide 3 - Slide 4 - Slide 5 - Slide 6 - Slide 7 - Slide 8 - Slide 9 - Slide 10 - Slide 11 - Slide 12 - Slide 13 - Slide 14 - Slide 15 - Slide 16 - Slide 17 - Slide 18 - Slide 19 - Slide 20 - Slide 21 - Slide 22 - Slide 23 - Slide 24 - Slide 25 - Slide 26 - Slide 27 - Slide 28 - Slide 29 - Slide 30 - Slide 31 - Slide 32 - Slide 33

Slide 31.jpg



The bottom line in this program is local production. The entire economy rides on the back of physical production. If you are a computer worker or a paper shuffler – don’t forget that it is real, physical production that constitutes the substance of society.

Start producing. Start tinkering. Start becoming a producing member of your community. That’s the only way we can make a better world, and get the bad uglies out of running our lives.

We are asking you to absorb the type of philosophy embodied by the GVCS – that it is about tools with which communities can produce their own wealth from local resources – and keep that wealth in their borders. Once again, we’re not against global exchange – but just not in favor of complete dependence.

As another story – I must say what level of technology is appropriate. It is that which is common sense. If it doesn’t make sense, someone will try to use it to enslave you.

We have been swindled out of practical skills and technical literacy by our education and media. We don’t know that we can be self-sufficient – only that the Corporation will provide for us.

But the answers are beautiful and simple. CEB bricks. Solar energy. Permaculture. Permafacture. Let me assure you that the high level physics and science are rarely about making life better. I was searching for those solutions myself when I was back in school – going into Fusion thinking that it could be the next solution to the world’s energy crisis. I was totally oblivious that we can provide all energy amply from what already comes from the sun.

At one point it hit me, though. I was faced with a physics formula on a wave traveling in space that took up a good fraction of a page – and frustrated with my lack of understanding of it- I asked the professor if he could just point to some physical situation or occurrence that would clarify what the formula meant. He answered, ‘There is none. I made it up.’

You see, that’s the type of swindle that we’re up against. The high level science will not save us – it is more about making the obvious solutions accessible. That’s precisely the nature of the GVCS. It doesn’t require rocket science to get involved – just high school math and physics – and beyond that, it’s primarily organizational work of distilling the relevant information to what truly works. That’s what we’ve been doing nearly full time for about 5 years now, and I believe that the solutions we’re proposing simply work. If you can propose better solutions – and if you can demonstrate that they have the potential of meeting OSE Specifications – then we want to hear about them. We’re always open to better solutions.