OSE Collaboration Protocol: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


[https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1uftFsVQZLVmJqDI3gcNFbANLc2K9HzC4i22im1-nrhE/edit#slide=id.g638faeb3b0_3_51 edit]
[https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1uftFsVQZLVmJqDI3gcNFbANLc2K9HzC4i22im1-nrhE/edit#slide=id.g638faeb3b0_3_51 edit]
=Basic Questions=
*'''How do you assure widespread interest?''' Work on important problems, such as solving for renewable energy, planting trees, or ending poverty. The [[GVCS]] qualifies as an important problem. However, the second side of this is that the solutions to these are simple and not exotic, requiring embrace of complexity - so it's often easier to do things like 'saving puppies' than 'transforming the world'.
*'''How to assure widespread participation?''' Host incentive challenges, hackathons, or other Apollo-style projects. The [[OSE Incentive Challenge]] qualifies.


=Links=
=Links=

Revision as of 00:27, 28 March 2020

Overview

OSE engages in large-scale product development. To date, this development was never large scale, peaking at only ~50 during some of OSE's Extreme Builds. But the goal is to coordinate ~2000 developers effectively in concurrent tasks consistent with a Second Toyota Paradox style of development.

edit

Basic Questions

  • How do you assure widespread interest? Work on important problems, such as solving for renewable energy, planting trees, or ending poverty. The GVCS qualifies as an important problem. However, the second side of this is that the solutions to these are simple and not exotic, requiring embrace of complexity - so it's often easier to do things like 'saving puppies' than 'transforming the world'.
  • How to assure widespread participation? Host incentive challenges, hackathons, or other Apollo-style projects. The OSE Incentive Challenge qualifies.

Links